Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of field and laboratory microcosm methods on the mass loss ofQuercus serrata andPinus densiflora leaf litter

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

The decay rates of Japanese Konara Oak (Quercus serrata Murray) and Japanese Red Pine (Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc.) leaf litter were monitored for one year. It aimed to compare the decomposition of leaf litter using microcosms set up in the field (FM) and in the greenhouse (GM), with the litterbag (LB) method as control. Results showed that incubation setting affected the decay rate (k), respiration rates and the changes in the concentrations of nitrogen (N). Thek value ofQuercus in FM was higher than LB, while thek value ofPinus was higher in the LB than in FM. The decay ratesk for both species, however, were significantly lower in GM than FM and LB, clearly suggesting that decay rate was inhibited in the greenhouse. Significant differences in microclimatic variables and soil biological activities (soil respiration) existed between greenhouse and field microcosms, hence, the decay rates were affected. The N concentrations for both litter types increased as decomposition proceeded. Decomposition studies using laboratory microcosm approach alone may lead to erroneous conclusions especially if no appropriate field studies are conducted along with it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Adams, M.B. and Angradi, T.R. (1996) Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of hardwood leaf litter in the Fernow whole-watershed acidification experiment. For. Ecol. Manage. 83: 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ando, M. (1970) Litter fall and decomposition in some evergreen coniferous forests. Jpn. J. Ecol. 20: 170–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B., MacClaugherty, C., and Johansson, M.B. (1993) Litter massloss in late stages of decomposition at some climatically and nutritionally different pine sites. Long-term decomposition in a Scot pine forest. VIII. Can. J. Bot. 71: 680–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. and Staaf, H. (1981) Leaching accumulation and release of nitrogen in decomposing forest litter. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 33: 163–178.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bocock, K.L. and Gilbert, O.J. (1957) The disappearance of leaf litter under different woodland conditions. Plant Soil 9: 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnel, F.L., Tait, D.E.N., Flanagan, P.W., and Van Cleve, K. (1977) Microbial respiration and substrate weight loss-I. Soil Biol. Biochem. 9: 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S.R. (1996) Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 77: 677–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D.C. and Crossley, D.A. Jr. (1996) Fundamentals of soil ecology. 205pp, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couteaux, M., Bottner, P., and Berg, B. (1995) Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Tree 10: 63–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, R.L. and Thomas, T.B. (1990) Decomposition and nutrient release from green needles of western hemlock and Pacific silver fir in an old-growth temperate rain forest, Olympic National Oak, Washington. Can. J. For. Res. 25: 1049–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosz, J.R., Likens, G.E., and Bormann, F.H. (1973) Nutrient release from decomposing leaf and branch litter in the Hubbard Brook Forest, New Hampshire. Ecol. Monogr. 43: 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, M.E., Baker, G.A., Spycher, G., and Greene, S.E. (1990) Leaf-litter decomposition in thePicea/Tsuga forest of Olympic National Park, Washington, U.S.A. For. Ecol. Manage. 31: 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, D.C., Lockaby, B.G., and Chappelka, A.H. (1995) Influence of microclimate on decomposition in loblolly pine stands: a field microcosm approach. Can. J. For. Res. 25: 1570–1577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, F., Katagiri, S., Miyake, N., and Sudo, S. (1977) Studies on mineral cycling in a deciduous broad-leaved forest at Sanbe Forest of Shimane University (II) Decomposition rate of Ao horizon and some experiments of leaf decomposition by litter-bag method. Bull. Fac. Agric. Res. Shimane Univ. 11: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, M., Berg, B., and Meentemeyer, V. (1995) Litter massloss rates in late stages of decomposition in climatic transect of pine forests. Long-term decomposition in a Scots pine forest. IX Can J. Bot. 73: 1509–1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, N. and Sato, T. (1996) Soil biological response to stemflow of Japanese red cedar. Res. Environ. Earth 37: 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katagiri, S., Miyake, N., and Fujihara, Y. (1987) Distribution and stand structure of natural Japanese Red-pine (Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc.) in Sanbe Forest of Shimane University. Bull. Fac. Agric. Res. Shimane Univ. 21: 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara, T. (1975) Decomposition of litter on forest floor. II Effect of the moisture of two kinds of leaf litter in their decomposition rates. Jpn. J. Ecol. 25: 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara, T. and Sato, A. (1974) Decomposition of litter in forest floor (I). Study on the decomposition rate by litterbag method. J. Jpn. For. Soc. 56: 528–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lousier, J.D. and Parkinson, D. (1976) Litter decomposition in a cool temperate deciduous forest. Can. J. Bot. 54: 419–436.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minderman, G. (1968) Addition, decomposition and accumulation of organic matter in the soil. J. Ecol. 56: 355–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melillo, J.M., Aber, J.B., and Muratore, J.F. (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63: 621–626.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.C., de Ruiter, P.C., Hunt, H.W., Coleman, D.C., and Freckman, D.W. (1996) Microcosms and soil ecology: critical linkages between field studies and modelling food webs. Ecology 77: 694–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, L.A. and MaCauley, B.J. (1982) Eucalyptus leaf-litter decomposition: effects of relative humidity and substrate moisture content. Soil Biol. Biochem. 14: 233–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J.S. (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44: 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W.F., Taylor, B.R., and Parkinson, D. (1990) Decomposition of aspen (Populus tremuloides) leaf litter modified by leaching. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 943–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarmby, C. and Allen, S.E. (1989) Organic constituents.In Chemical analysis of ecological materials. 2nd ed. Allen, S.E. (ed.), Blackwell Sci. Pubs., 189–191.

  • Rowland, A.P. and Roberts, J.D. (1994) Lignin and cellulose fractionation in decomposition studies using acid-detergent fibre methods. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 25: 269–277.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutigliano, E.A., Virzo de Santo, A., Berg, B., Alfani, A., and Fioretto, A. (1996) Lignin decomposition in decaying leaves ofFagus sylvatica L. and needles ofAbies alba Mill. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28: 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulides, D.A. and Allison, F.E. (1961) Effects of drying and freezing soils on carbon dioxide production, available mineral nutrients, aggregation, and bacterial population. Soil Sci. 90: 291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT, Inc. (1992) SYSTAT for windows: Statistics, Version 5. 750pp, Evanston, IL.

  • Swift, M.J., Heal, O.W., and Anderson, J.M. (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. 372 pp, Blackwell Sci. Pubs.

  • Takeda, H., Ishida, Y., and Tsutsumi T. (1987) Decomposition of leaf litter in relation to litter quality and site conditions. Mem. Coll. Agric., Kyoto Univ. 130: 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. R. and Parkinson, D. (1988a) A new microcosm approach to litter decomposition studies. Can. J. Bot. 66: 1933–1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.R. and Parkinson, D. (1988b) Aspen and pine leaf litter decomposition in laboratory microcosms. II. Interactions of temperature and moisture level. Can. J. Bot. 66: 1966–1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.R. and Parkinson, D. (1988c) Respiration and mass loss rates of aspen and pine leaf litter decomposing in laboratory microcosms. Can. J. Bot. 66: 1948–1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuben, A. and Verhoef, H.A. (1992) Relevance of micro and mesocosm experiments for studying soil ecosystems processes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24: 1179–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trofymow, J.A., Prestom, C.M., and Prescott, C.E. (1995) Litter quality and its potential effect on decay rates of materials from Canadian forests. Water Air Soil Pollut. 82: 215–226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, H.B., Jr. (1970) The leaching of substances from plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 21: 305–332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, H.A. (1996) The role of soil microcosms in the study of ecosystem processes. Ecology 77: 685–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, K.T., Edmonds, R.L., Anton, G.C., and Vogt, D.J. (1980) Relationships between CO2 evolution, ATP concentrations and decomposition in four forest ecosystems in western Washington. OIKOS 35: 72–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wieder, R.W. and Lang, G. (1982) A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litterbags. Ecology 63: 1636–1642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, V. (1991) Effects of acid rain on leaf-litter decomposition in a beech forest on calcareous soil. Biol. Fert. Soils 11: 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Salamanca, E.F., Kaneko, N. & Katagiri, S. Comparison of field and laboratory microcosm methods on the mass loss ofQuercus serrata andPinus densiflora leaf litter. J. For. Res. 2, 159–164 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348214

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348214

Key words

Navigation