Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a behavioral theory of systemic hypothesis-testing and the error of the third kind

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific ideas neither arise nor develop in a vacuum. They are always nutured against a background of prior, partially conflicting ideas. Systemic hypothesistesting is the problem of testing scientific hypotheses relative to various systems of background knowledge. This paper shows how the problem of systemic hypothesis-testing (Sys HT) can be systematically expressed as a constrained maximimization problem. It is also shown how the error of the third kind (E III) is fundamental to the theory of Sys HT.The error of the third kind is defined as the probability of having solved the ‘wrong’ problem when one should have solved the ‘right’ problem. This paper shows howE III can be given both a systematic as well as a systemic treatment. Sys HT gives rise to a whole host of new decision problems, puzzles, and paradoxes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ackoff, R. L., ‘Towards a Behavioral Theory of Communication’Mgmt. Sci. 4 (1958) 218–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L., ‘Towards a System of Systems Concepts’Mgmt. Sci. 17 (1971) 661–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R.L.,The Future of the Future, Busch Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R.L. and Emery, F.,On Purposeful Systems, Aldine, Chicago, 1972.

  • Ackoff, R. L., Gupta, S., and Minas, J. S.,Scientific Method: Optimizing Applied Research Decisions.

  • Buckley, W.,Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist: A Sourcebook, Aldine, Chicago, 1968.

  • Churchman, C.W.,The Systems Approach, Delacorte, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W.,The Design of Inquiring Systems, Basic Books, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.,The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (transl. by P. Wiener), Althenum, New York, 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F.,Systems Thinking, Penguin, Middlesex, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, H.,Introduction to Statistical Inference, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I.I., ‘A Communication Model of Dialectical Inquiring Systems - A Strategy for Strategic Planning’Mgmt. Sci. 17 (1971) B-6342B-648.

  • Mitroff, I.I., ‘Systems, Inquiry, and the Meanings of Falsification’Phil. Sci. 40 (1973) 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I.I. and Betz, F., ‘Dialectical Decision Theory: A Meta-Theory of Decision-Making’.Mgmt. Sci. 19 (1972) 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I.I. and Blankenship, V., ‘On the Methodology of the Holistic Experiment: An Approach to the Conceptualization of Large-scale Social Experiments’J. of Tech. Forecasting and Soc. Ch. 4 (1973) 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I.I. and Featheringham, T. R., ‘On Systemic Problem Solving and the Error of the Third Kind’Behav. Sci., 1974, in press.

  • Pietarinen, J., ‘Quantitative Tools for Evaluating Scientific Systematizations’ in J. Hintikka and P. Suppes (eds.),Information and Inference, D. Reidel, Dordrecht Holland, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L.,General Systems Theory, George Braziller, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitroff, I.I., Featheringham, T.R. Towards a behavioral theory of systemic hypothesis-testing and the error of the third kind. Theor Decis 7, 205–220 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334316

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334316

Keywords

Navigation