Skip to main content
Log in

On the sampling interpretation of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests in the context of conditional maximum likelihood estimation

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context ofconditional maximum likelihood (CML) estimation, confidence intervals can be interpreted in three different ways, depending on the sampling distribution under which these confidence intervals contain the true parameter value with a certain probability. These sampling distributions are (a) the distribution of the data given theincidental parameters, (b) the marginal distribution of the data (i.e., with the incidental parameters integrated out), and (c) the conditional distribution of the data given the sufficient statistics for the incidental parameters. Results on the asymptotic distribution of CML estimates under sampling scheme (c) can be used to construct asymptotic confidence intervals using only the CML estimates. This is not possible for the results on the asymptotic distribution under sampling schemes (a) and (b). However, it is shown that theconditional asymptotic confidence intervals are also valid under the other two sampling schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, E. B. (1970). Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum likelihood estimators.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 32, 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B. (1973).Conditional inference and models for measuring. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mentalhygiejnisk Forlag, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. B., & Madsen, M. (1977). Estimating the parameters of the latent population distribution.Psychometrika, 42, 357–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramèr, H. (1946).Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, J., & Verhelst, N. (1986). Maximum likelihood estimation in generalized Rasch models.Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. H. (1981). On the existence and uniqueness of maximum likelihood estimates in the Rasch model.Psychometrika, 53, 525–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follman, D. A. (1988). Consistent estimation in the Rasch model based on nonparametric margins.Psychometrika, 53, 553–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graybill, F. A. (1976).Theory and application of the linear model. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, J., & Wolfowitz, J. (1956). Consistency of the maximum likihood estimator in the presence of infinitely many nuisance parameters.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 887–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L. (1983).Theory of point estimation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, B., Clogg, C. C., & Grego, J. (1991). Semiparametric estimation in the Rasch model and related exponential response models, including a simple latent class model for item analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 96–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfanzagl, J. (1993). A case of asymptotic equivalence between conditional and marginal maximum likelihood estimators.Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 35, 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfanzagl, J. (1994). On item parameter estimation in certain latent trait models. In G. H. Fischer & D. Laming (Eds.),Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics and methodology (pp. 249–263). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indebted to Theo Eggen, Norman Verhelst and one of Psychometrika's reviewers for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maris, E. On the sampling interpretation of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests in the context of conditional maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika 63, 65–71 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295437

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295437

Key words

Navigation