Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of mulches on bacterial populations and enzyme activity in soil and vegetable yields

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Mulches in five combinations of clear plastic, black plastic, and undecomposed leaves covered by or on top of black or clear plastic film to modify soil temperature, were used to study the enzyme activity of the soil and numbers of bacteria able to produce degradative enzymes. Yield of pepper and broccoli planted through the mulches was measured.

The numbers of bacteria in the soil able to excrete protease, phosphatase, cellulase, and lipase were correlated with one another suggesting that the same group of organisms excreted the different enzymes. The activity of enzymes in the soil was similarly correlated. Bacterial urease-producers and the urease activity in the soil were not correlated with the number of other enzyme producers or activity of other enzymes in soil suggesting an independent population of urease producers degraded the urea fertilizer used. Temperature differences of 11–14°C provided by the various mulches appeared insufficient to create important differences in populations and biochemical activities of soil bacteria.

Yield of broccoli was greatest early in the season in soil warmed under black polyethylene plastic and later in the season in the soil cooled with leaf mulch over black plastic. Yield of pepper was greatest in mid-to-late summer on soil warmed with black plastic, but the highest yield was obtained in early fall in soil with clear and black plastic over leaf mulch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Army T J and Hudspeth E B Jr 1960 Alternation of the microclimate of the seed zone. Agron. J. 52, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benefield C B 1971 A rapid method for measuring cellulase activity in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 3, 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarkson V A 1960 Effect of black polyethylene mulch on soil and microclimate temperature and nitrate level. Agron. J. 52, 307–309.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colowick S P and Kaplan N O Eds. 1957 Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 3, 468–471.

  5. Emmert E M 1957 Black polyethylene for mulching vegetables. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 69, 464–469.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fiore J V and Nord F F 1949 Lipase determinations with the aid of polyvinyl alcohol. Arch. Biochem. 23, 473–479.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flint L H 1928 Crop-plant stimulation with paper mulch. U.S. Dept. Agric. Tech. Bull. 75.

  8. Hankin L and Anagnostakis S L 1977 Solid media containing carboxymethylcellulose to detect Cx cellulase activity in microorganisms. J. Gen. Microbiol. 98, 109–115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hankin L and Hill D E 1978 Proportion of bacteria in agricultural soils able to produce degradative enzymes. Soil Sci. 126, 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hankin L, Poincelot R P and Anagnostakis S L 1976 Microorganisms from composting leaves: Ability to produce extracellular degradative enzymes. Microbial Ecol. 2, 296–308.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hankin L, Sands D C and Hill D E 1974 Relation of land use to some degradative enzymatic activities of soil bacteria. Soil Sci. 118, 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hankin L, Stephens G R and Dillman W F 1974 Quality-control significance of special media for enumeration of microbial groups in cottage-type cheese. J. Milk Food Technol. 38, 738–744.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Honma S, McArdle F, Carew J and Dewey D H 1959 Soil and air temperature as affected by polyethylene film mulches. Mich. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 41, 834–842.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacks G V, Brind W D and Smith R 1955 Mulches. Commonwealth Bur. Soil Sci. Tech. Comm. 49.

  15. Kuprevich V F and Shcherbakova T A 1971 Comparative enzymatic activity in diverse types of soil. pp 167–201.In Soil Biochemistry II. Eds. A D McLaren and J Skujins. Marcel Dekker, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ladd J N and Butler J H A 1972 Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 4, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lippert L F, Takatori F H and Wilding F L 1964 Soil moisture under bands of petroleum and polyethylene mulches. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 85, 541–546.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martley F G, Jayashankar S R and Lawrence R C 1970 An improved agar medium for the detection of proteolytic organisms in total bacterial counts. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 33, 363–370.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moore S 1968 Amino acid analysis: aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent for ninhydrin reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 243, 6281–6283.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson N 1944 A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 153, 375–380.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nie N H, Hull C H, Jenkins J G, Steinbrenner K and Bent D H 1970 SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ross D J 1977 Protease activity, and its relationship to nitrogen mineralisation in some soils under pasture and tussock grassland. N.Z. J. Sci. 20, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schales F D and Sheldrake R 1966 Mulch effects on soil conditions and muskmelon response. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 88, 425–430.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sharf J M Ed. 1966 Recommended methods for the microbiological examination of foods, 2nd ed. Am. Pub. Health Assoc., New York, NY, 171 p.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sierra G 1957 A simple method for the detection of lipolytic activity of microorganisms and some observations on the influence of the contact between cells and fatty substrate. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. Serol. 23, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Skujins J J 1967 Enzymes in soil.In Soil Biochemistry. I, Eds. A P McLaren and G H Peterson. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 371–414.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Somogyi M 1952 Notes on sugar determination. J. Biol. Chem. 195, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Speir T W 1976 Studies on a climosequence of soils in tussock grasslands. 8. Urease, phosphatase, and sulphatase activities of tussock plant materials and of soil. N.Z.J. Sci. 19, 382–387.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Speir T W 1977 Studies on a climosequence of soils in tussock grasslands. 10. Distribution of urease, phosphatase, and sulphatase activities in soil fractions. N.Z. J. Sci. 20, 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Speir T W 1977 Studies on a climosequence of soils in tussock grasslands. 11. Urease, phosphatase, and sulphatase activities of topsoils and their relationships with other properties including plant available sulphur. N.Z. J. Sci. 20, 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Speir T W and Ross D J 1975 Effects of storage on the activities of protease, urease, phosphatase, and sulphatase in three soils under pasture. N.Z. J. Sci. 18, 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Todorova B 1972 Effect of fertilization on the activity of cellulolytic bacteria and breakdown of cellulase in the soil. Symp. Biol. Hung. 11, 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hankin, L., Hill, D.E. & Stephens, G.R. Effect of mulches on bacterial populations and enzyme activity in soil and vegetable yields. Plant Soil 64, 193–201 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184250

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184250

Key words

Navigation