Abstract
We study the block spin transformation for the 2D Ising model at the critical temperatureT c . We consider the model with the constraint that the total spin in each block is zero. An old argument by Cassandro and Gallavotti strongly supports the Gibbsianness of the transformed measure, provided that such model has a critical temperatureT′ c lower thanT c . After describing a possible rigorous approach to the problem, we present numerical evidence that indeedT′ c <T c and study the Dobrushin-Shlosman uniqueness condition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Cammarota, The large block spin interaction,Nuovo Cimento 96B:1–16 (1986).
M. Cassandro and G. Gallavotti, The Lavoisier law and the critical point,Nuovo Cimento 25B:691 (1975).
R. L. Dobrushin, Prescribing a system of random variables by conditional distributions,Theory Prob. Appl. 15:453–486 (1970).
R. L. Dobrushin and S. Shlosman, Constructive criterion for the uniqueness of Gibbs fields, inStatistical Physics and Dynamical Systems (Birkhauser, Basel, 1985), pp. 347–370.
R. L. Dobrushin and S. Shlosman, Completely analytical Gibbs fields, inStatistical Physics and Dynamical Systems (Birkhauser, Basel, 1985), pp. 371–403.
R. L. Dobrushin and S. Shlosman, Completely analytical interactions constructive description,J. Stat. Phys. 46:983–1014 (1987).
A. C. D. van Enter, R. Fernández, and A. D. Sokal, Regularity properties and pathologies of position-space renormalization-group transformations: Scope and limitations of Gibbsian theory,J. Stat. Phys. 72:879–1167 (1994).
R. Fernandez and C. Pfister, Non quasi-local projections of Gibbs states, preprint (1994).
G. Gallavotti and H. J. F. Knops, Block-spins interactions in the Ising model,Commun. Math. Phys. 36:171–184 (1974).
R. B. Griffits and P. A. Pearce, Mathematical properties of position-space renormalization group transformations,J. Stat. Phys. 20:499–545 (1979).
J. Grimmett, Private communication.
D. W. Heermann and A. N. Burkitt,Physica A 162:210 (1990).
R. B. Israel, Banach algebras and Kadanoff transformations, inRandom Fields,J. Fritz, J. L. Lebowitz, and D. Szasz, ed., (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981), Vol. II, pp. 593–608.
T. Kennedy, Some rigorous results on majority rule renormalization group transformations near the critical point, preprint.
O. K. Kozlov, Gibbs description of a system of random variables,Probl. Inform. Transmission 10:258–265 (1974).
J. Lorinczi and K. Vande Velde, A note on the projection of Gibbs measures, preprint (1994).
F. Martinelli and E. Olivieri, Finite volume mixing conditions for lattice spin systems and exponential approach to equilibrium of Glauber dynamics, inProceedings of 1992 Les Houches Conference on Cellular Automata and Cooperative Systems, N. Boccara, E. Goles, S. Martinez, and P. Picco, eds. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993).
F. Martinelli and E. Olivieri, Approach to equilibrium of Glauber dynamics in the one phase region I. The attractive case,Commun. Math. Phys. (1994), in press.
F. Martinelli and E. Olivieri, Approach to equilibrium of Glauber dynamics in the one phase region II. The general case,Commun. Math. Phys. (1994), in press.
F. Martinelli and E. Olivieri,Some remarks on pathologies of renormalization group transformations for the Ising model,J. Stat. Phys. 72:1169–1177 (1994).
F. Martinelli, E. Olivieri, and R. Schonmann, For 2D lattice spin systems weak mixing implies strong mixing,Commun. Math. Phys. (1994), in press.
E. Olivieri, On a cluster expansion for lattice spin systems: A finite size condition for the convergence,J. Stat. Phys. 50:1179–1200 (1988).
E. Olivieri and P. Picco, Cluster expansion forD-dimensional lattice systems and finite volume factorization properties,J. Stat. Phys. 59:221–256 (1990).
R. H. Schonmann, Projections of Gibbs measures may be non-Gibbsian,Commun. Math. Phys. 124:1–7 (1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benfatto, G., Marinari, E. & Olivieri, E. Some numerical results on the block spin transformation for the 2D Ising model at the critical point. J Stat Phys 78, 731–757 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02183686
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02183686