Abstract
A particular case of a cellular automata-based model of two-state opinion formation in social groups with a strong leader is studied. We consider a 2D Euclidian geometry of “social space” and mutual interactions ∞ 1/r n. The model shows an interesting dynamics which can be analytically calculated. There are two stable states of the system: a cluster around the leader and unification. Unstable clusters may also appear. A variation in parameters such as the leader's strength or the “social temperature” can change the size of a cluster or, when they reach some critical values, make the system jump into another state. For a certain range of parameters the system exhibits bistability and hysteresis phenomena. We obtained explicit formulas for the cluster size, critical leader's strength, and critical “social temperature.” These analytical results are verified by computer simulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Haken,Synergetics. An Introduction (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983);Advanced Synergetics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1983).
S. Wolfram,Theory and Application of Cellular Automata (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986).
Cellular Automata, Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Workshop, Los Alamos, March 1983,Physica 10D(1) (1984);Cellular Automata: Theory and Experiment, Proceedings of the Workshop, Los Alamos, September 1989,Physica D 45(1–3) (1990).
D. J. Amit,Modeling Brain Function (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).
H. G. Schuster,Deterministic Chaos. An Introduction (VCH, Weinheim, 1988); E. Ott,Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
W. Weidlich and G. Haag,Concepts and Models of Quantitatively Sociology (Springer, Berlin, 1983); W. Weidlich,Phys. Rep. 204:1 (1991); Zhang Wei-Bin,Synergetic Economics (Springer, Berlin, 1991).
D. Helbing,Physica A 193:241 (1993);Physica A 193:241 (1993); D. HelbingQuantitative Sociodynamics (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995).
T. Ohnishi,Prog. Nucl. Energy 26:163 (1991).
H. W. Lorenz,Nonlinear Dynamical Equations and Chaotic Economy (Springer, Berlin, 1993); D. S. Dendrinos and M. Sonis,Chaos and Socio-spatial Dynamics (Springer, Berlin, 1990).
J. Benhabib, ed.,Cycles and Chaos in Economic Equilibrium (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1992).
J. B. Rosser,From Catastrophe to Chaos. A General Theory of Economic Discontinuities (Kluwer, Berlin, 1991).
M. G. Kusch and B. E. Ydstie,Physica D 72:309 (1994).
T. Jaditz and C. L. Sayers,Int. J. Bifur. Chaos 3:745 (1993); C. G. Gilmore,Int. J. Bifur. Chaos 3:583 (1993).
A. Garcia-Olivares,Kybernets 22:9 (1993).
D. Richards,Behav. Sci. 35:291 (1990).
J. A. Holyst, T. Hagel. G. Haag, and W. Weidlich,J. Evol. Econ. in press (1995).
R. W. White,Syst. Res. 67:245 (1989).
R. R. Vallacher and A. Nowak, eds.,Dynamical Systems in Social Psychology (Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1994).
N. Gilbert and J. Doran, eds.,Simulating Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Processes (University College London, London, 1994); T. Ostrom, J. Skowronsky, and A. Nowak, InSocial Cognition: Contributions to Classic Issues in Social Psychology T. Levine, D. Hamilton, and T. Ostrom, eds. (Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1994).
M. Lewenstein, A. Nowak, and B. Latané,Phys. Rev. A 45:703 (1992).
B. Latané, J. M. Liu, A. Nowak, M. Bonevento, and L. Zheng,Personality Soc. Psychol. Bull., in press (1995).
A. Nowak, J. Szamrej, and B. Latané,Psych. Rev. 97:362 (1990); A. Nowak, M. Lewenstein, and J. Szamrej,Sci. Am., in press (1995).
J. von Neumann,Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata, ed. A. W. Burks (University of Illinois Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1966).
B. Latané,Am. Psychol. 36:343 (1981).
B. Latané, A. Nowak, and J. Liu,Behav. Sci. 39:1 (1994).
L. Festinger, S. Schachter, and K. Back,Social Pressures in Informal Groups (Stanford University Press, 1950).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kacperski, K., Holyst, J.A. Phase transitions and hysteresis in a cellular automata-based model of opinion formation. J Stat Phys 84, 169–189 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02179581
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02179581