Skip to main content
Log in

Testing for scaling in natural forms and observables

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The general procedure of calculating fractal dimensions or other exponents is based on estimating some quantity as a function of scale and on assessing whether or not this function is a power law. This power law manifests itself in a log (quantity) versus log (scale) plot as a linear region (scaling). It has thus become the practice to estimate dimensions by the slope of some linear region in those log-log plots. When we are dealing with exact fractals (the Koch curve, for example) there are no problems. When, however, we are working with natural forms or observables, problems begin to emerge. In such cases the scaling region is subjectively estimated and often is only the result of the generic property of the quantity to increase monotonically or decrease monotonically as the scale goes to zero irrespective of the geometry of the object. Here we discuss these issues and suggest a procedure to deal with them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. B. Mandelbrot,The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. B. Mandelbrot,Science 156:636 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Feder,Fractals (Plenum Press, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.-O. Peitgen, H. Jürgens, and D. Saupe,Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.-K. Peng, S. V. Buldyrev, A. L. Goldberger, S. Havlin, F. Sclortino, M. Simons, and H. E. Stanley,Nature 356:168 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. A. Tsonis, J. B. Elsner, and P. A. Tsonis,Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 197:1288 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Karlin and V. Brendel,Science 259:77–680 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Montroll and M. F. Shlesinger, InNonequilibrium Phenomena II, From Stochastics to Hydrodynamics, J. L. Lebowitz and E. W. Montroll, eds. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984), pp. 1–121.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. A. Tsonis, G. N. Triantafyllou, and R. Picard,Appl. Math. Lett. 7:19 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. R. Osborne and A. Provenzale,Physica D 35:357 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. A. Tsonis,Chaos: Theory to Applications (Plenum Press, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Saupe, InThe Science of Fractal Images, H.-O. Peitgen and D. Saupe, eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsonis, A.A., Elsner, J.B. Testing for scaling in natural forms and observables. J Stat Phys 81, 869–880 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02179296

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02179296

Key Words

Navigation