Skip to main content
Log in

Salt tolerance of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) at two growth stages

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The salt tolerance of two cultivars of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek), AuMg 588 and Mg 6601, was assessed at germination and at the seedling stage. Increasing salt concentration significantly reduced the percentage germination, fresh and dry weights, protein and carbohydrate contents of all plant parts, leaf area, shoot and root lengths, shoot/ root ratio, chlorophylls a, and b, and total chlorophyll in both the cultivars. At high salinities, cv AuMg 588 had greater fresh and dry weights of all plant parts, than cv Mg 6601, but the latter had greater chlorophyll a, and b, and total chlorophyll contents than cv AuMg 588. Cultivars did not differ significantly in other characters measured.Vigna radiata is very sensitive to salt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnon D I and Hoagland D R 1940 Crop production in artificial solutions. Soil Sci. 50, 463–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, McNeilly T and Bradshaw A D 1986 The response of selected salt tolerant and normal lines of four grass species to NaCl in sand culture. New Phytol. 104, 453–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashwell G 1957 Colorimetric analysis of sugars.In. Methods in Enzymology 3, 84–85, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein L and Hayward H E (1958) Physiology of salt tolerance. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 9, 25–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein E 1985 Salt-tolerant crops: Origins, development, and prospects of the concept. Plant and Soil 89, 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwake S, Kaawai M and Ikemoto S 1958 Studies on salt injury in rice plant. XVI. Proc. Sci. Soc. Japan. 27 (1), 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M L 1958 Soil Chemical Analysis. Constable and Co. Ltd. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas E V and Hoffman G J 1977 Crop salt tolerance—Current assessment. J. Irrig. Drainage Div. ASCE 103, 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiri A and Poljakoff-Mayber A 1970 Effect of various salinity regimes on growth, leaf expansion and transpiration rate of bean plants. Soil Sci. 109, 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble C L 1983 The potential for breeding salt tolerant plants. Proc. Royal Soc. Victoria 95 (3), 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon M C 1978 The testing of salt tolerance variability among tall wheatgrass lines. Agron. J. 70, 719–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherazi S A U, Ahmed N and Khan M F A 1971 Effect of saline irrigation water on the yield and chemical composition of maize variety J-I. J. Agr. Res. 9, 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strogonov B P, Kabanov V V Shevajakova N I Lapine L P Kamizerko E I Popov B A Dostonova R Kh and Prykhod'ko L S 1970 Structure and Function of Plant Cells in Saline Habitats. Nauka Koscow (Trans. Eng.) John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witham F H, Blaydes D F and Devlin R M 1971 Experiments in plant physiology. pp. 55–58. Van Nostand Reinhold Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyn Jones R G 1981 Salt tolerance.In Physiological processes limiting plant productivity. Ed. C B Johnson, pp. 271–292. Butterworths, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ashraf, M., Rasul, E. Salt tolerance of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) at two growth stages. Plant Soil 110, 63–67 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143540

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143540

Key words

Navigation