Abstract
Electric field stimulation (EFS) causes a non-adrenergic relaxation of precontracted human airways. Only 10–20% of this response can be blocked with the nervous conductance blocker tetrodotoxin (TTX). Therefore, 80–90% of the non-adrenergic relaxation is not neurally mediated. The mechanism of this non-neural component is unclear. We examined whether EFS induces the generation of muscle relaxing substances in oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit buffer. Strips of central airways of 6 patients were precontracted with methacholine (10−5 M) and exposed to Krebs buffer that had previously been stimulated with EFS (50 V, 0.3 ms, 30 s, 1–50 Hz). Results were compared to those obtained with unstimulated buffer. The contractile state of the airways did not change significantly with either EFS-stimulated or unstimulated buffer. We conclude that in oxygenated Krebs buffer EFS does not cause generation of substances that change the contractile state of prestimulated human airways.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. C. de Jongste, H. Mons, I. L. Bonta and K. F. Kerrebijn,In vitro responses of airways from an asthmatic patient. Eur. J. Respir. Dis.71, 23–29 (1987).
S. M. Taylor, P. D. Paré and R. R. Schellenberg,Cholinergic and non-adrenergic mechanisms in human and guinea pig airways. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol.56, 958–965 (1984).
B. Greenberg, K. Rhoden and P. J. Barnes,Activated oxygen molecules generated by electrical stimulation affect vascular smooth muscle. J. Moll. Cell. Cardiol.18, 975–981 (1986).
J. C. de Jongste, R. van Strik, I. L. Bonta and K. F. Kerrebijn,Measurement of human airway smooth muscle function in vitro with the bronchiolar strip preparation. J. Pharmacol. Methods14, 111–118 (1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jongejan, R.C., de Jongste, J.C., Raatgeep, R.C. et al. Electrically stimulated Krebs-Henseleit buffer does not relax precontracted human bronchiin vitro . Agents and Actions 26, 75–76 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02126563
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02126563