Skip to main content
Log in

Structure of international collaboration in science: Typology of countries through multivariate techniques using a link indicator

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article patterns of international collaboration in science are investigated using a specific procedure to analyse data collected from theScience Citation Index. We develop an indicator based on the scientific linkages between countries established through internationally co-authored articles (COPs). The credibility, advantages and uses of this indicator are discussed. We apply the Correspondence Factorial Analysis method and the Minimum Spanning Tree classification to this indicator in order to observe the level of resemblance and the main characteristics of the collaboration structured by 98 countries in eight principal fields of science. The results shown summarize the diverse aspects of countries participating in collaborative works and bring into view the cognitive structure of international research. The use of these methods in the investigation of international collaboration contributes to the analysis of the complex structure of the scientific communities of different countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and references

  1. D. de B. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration, Part 1. The professional origines of scientific co-authorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. A. Lomnitz, M. W. Rees, L. Cameo, Publication and referencing patterns in a Mexican research institute,Social Studies of Science, 17 (1987) 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Kerwin, International science — an overview,Science, 213 (1981) 1069–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Internationalisation of Science and Technology, In:Science and Technology Policy Outlook 1988, OECD, Paris, 1988 31–38.

  5. Science Indicators 1981, National Science Board, Washington D. C., 1981.

  6. J. D. Frame, M. Carpenter, International research collaboration,Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Miquel, La coopération entre le Canada et la France en Science Fondamentale, In:Les enjeux économiques et politiques de l'innovation,M. Leclerc (Ed.), Presses de l'Université du Québec, Québec, 1990, pp. 201–222.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.W. Tijssen, H.F. Moed, Literature-based statistical analyses of international scientific cooperation — An exploratory case study of the Netherlands, In:Science and Technology Indicators,A.F.J. van Raan et al. (Ed.), DSWO Press, Leiden, 1988, pp. 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Schubert, T. Braun, International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.C. Doré, J.F. Miquel, Approche de l'Etude des Relations Structure Activité par Analyse des Correspondances,C.R. Académie des Science, 293 (3) (1981) 1061–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Bignon, P. Pons, J.C. Doré, J. Gilbert, T. Ojasoo, J.F. Miquel, J.P. Raynaud, A. Crastes de Paulet, Influence of di- and tri-phenylethylene estrogen/antiestrogen structure on the mechanisms of protein kinase C inhibition and activation as revealed by a multivariate analysis,Biochemical Pharmacology, 42 (1991) 1373–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.M. Carpenter, F. Narin, The adequacy of the Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 430–439.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Martin, UK scientific performance,Scientometrics 20, (1991) 333–357.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Carpenter, International Science Indicators-Development of indicators of international Scientific Activity using the Science Citation Index, Report submitted to National Science Foundation No. SRS77-22770 (1979).

  15. D. Frame, Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean,Interciencia, 2 (1977) 143–148. See also, Science & Engineering Indicators 1989, National Science Foundation (1989), 331.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance —Some comments on Martin's “Reply”,Scientometrics, 20 (1990) 359–362.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Science & Engineering Indicators 1989, National Science Foundation (1989), 335. See also Ref. 8.

  18. A.F.J. van Raan, R.J.W. Tijssen, An overview of quantitative science and technology indicators based on bibliometric methods,Consequences of the Technology Economy Programme for the Development of Indicators, OECD, 1990.

  19. J.P. Benzécri,L'analyse des données, II. L'analyse des correspondances, Dunod, Paris, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Chatfield, A. J. Collins, Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. In:Introduction to Multivariate Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London, 1989 p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.C. Prim, Shortest connection networks and some generalizations,Bell System Technology Journal, 36 (1957) 1389.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. C. Gower, G.J.S. Ross, Minimum spanning trees and single link cluster analysis,Applied Statistics, 18 (1969) 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Devillers, J.C. Doré, Heuristic potency of the minimum spanning tree (MST) method in toxicology,Ecotoxicology Environmental Safety, 17 (1989) 227.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L.L. Lederman, Science and technology policies and priorities: A comparative analysis,Science, 237 (1987) 1125–1133.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Braun, I. Gomez, A. Mendez, A. Schubert, International co-authorship patterns in physics and its subfields, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 24 (1992) 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Ekspong, Contribution to discussion on big science,Nobel Symposium, KVA, 1988.

  27. R. MacLeod, Organizing science under the Southern cross, In:The Commonwealth of Science,R. Macleod (Ed.), Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 1988, p. 19–39. See also pp. 40–72. AndI.D. Rae, Chemists at ANZAAS: Cabbages or Kings? pp. 166–195 in the same collection.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. El Alami, J.C. Doré, J.F. Miquel, International scientific collaboration in Arab countries,Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 249–263.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Excellence in the midst of poverty,Nature, 12 April (1984).

  30. Y. Okubo, J.F. Miquel, International Scientific Collaboration of Japan: Co-authorship Analysis,Journal of Science Policy and Research Management 6 (4), 1992, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Data based on 1986 version of CD-ROM of theScience Citation Index.

  32. The number of international co-authorships (COA) used in this article is supplied by CHI Research Inc.

  33. This Figure is based on the following calculation. Affinity Index for a Country A toward a Country B:Number of Co-operative Linkages between a country A and a country B×100 Number of Co-operative Linkages between a country A and the rest of the world For Affinity Index see:Y. Okubo, J.F. Miquel, International collaboration in basic science, In:Indikatoren der Wissenschaft und Technik-Theorie, Methoden, Anwendungen,P. Weingart et al. (Ed.), Campus, Forschung (1991) 49–71. See also: Research Output, In:Science Indicators 1991 Compendium,J. Gagné (Ed.), Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Science, Québec, 1991, p. 39–49. In these articles we present matrices of different dimensions.

  34. J.J. Salomon, Science, technology and society, In:New Technologies and Development, A. Johnston, A. Sasson (Eds.), UNESCO, Paris, 1986, p. 13–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okubo, Y., Miquel, J.F., Frigoletto, L. et al. Structure of international collaboration in science: Typology of countries through multivariate techniques using a link indicator. Scientometrics 25, 321–351 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028090

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028090

Keywords

Navigation