Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of professional competence, managerial role and status of group leaders to R&D performance

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the following basic issues of leadership in research units: (1) characteristics of the leader and the functions performed by him that predict the image of his quality; and (2) the role of leadership in enhancing the performance of the research unit. Analysis is based on data collected on 1460 research units in six countries for the second round of International Comparative Study on Organization and Performance of Research Units. Variations in the characteristics and role of leadership in different institutional settings and countries are analyzed through POSCOR (ranking programme based on partially ordered sets). Stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to examine the common pattern of relationship of various indices of leadership with the image of leader's quality and three measures of effectiveness — scientific, user-oriented and administrative. Analysis was repeated for each country to explore the stability in the pattern of relationships and to identify universal indices that have consistent relationships across countries. Implications of the results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. G. JAGO, Leadership: perspectives in theory and research,Management Science, 28 (1982) 316.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. A. FLEISHMAN,Leadership Climate and Supervisory Behavior, Ohio State University Personnel Research Board, Columbus, Ohio.

  3. A. W. HALPIN, B. J. WIENER, A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions, in: R. M. STOGDILL, A. E. COONS (Eds)Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement, Bureau of Business Research Monograph 88, Ohio State University, 1957, p. 39.

  4. AMITAI ETZIONI,A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations, Free Press, Glenco, Illinois, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. A. DUNTEMAN, B. M. BASS, Supervisory and engineering success associated with self, interaction and task orientation scores,Personnel Psychology, 16 (1963) 13; D. KATZ, R. L. KAHN, Leadership practices in relation to productivity and morale, in: D. CARTWRIGHT, A. ZANDER (Eds),Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, Row and Peterson, Evanston, Illinois, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. A. FLEISHMAN, E. F. HARRIS, Patterns of leadership related to employee grievances and turnover,Personnel Psychology, 15 (1962) 43; A. W. HALPIN, B. J. WIENER,op. cit., A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions, in: R. M. STOGDILL, A. E. COONS (Eds)Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement, Bureau of Business Research Monograph 88, Ohio State University, 1957, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Some exceptions, for instance, are the studies carried out by D. C. PELZ, F. M. ANDREWS,Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development, Wiley, New York, 1966; K. D. KNORR, R. MITTERMEIR, G. AICHHOLZER, G. WALLER, Leadership and group performance: A positive relationship in academic research units, in: F. M. ANDREWS (Ed.)Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries, Cambridge, New York, 1979; G. AICHHOLZER, R. MITTERMEIR, G. WALLER, On the differential importance of human relations aspects for research activities: A comparison between academic and industrial research units, in: J. FARKAS (Ed.),Sociology of Science and Research, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 1979; P. S. NAGPAUL, G. MEHTA, Leadership and environment for R&D: Comparative study of research units in India and Argentina,Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 44 (1985) 345; R. STANKIEWICZ,Leadership and the Performance of Research Groups, Research Policy Institute, Lund, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. J. GERPOTT, M. DOMSCH, The concept of professionalism and the management of salaried technical professionals: A cross-national perspective,Human Resource Management, 24 (1985) 207.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. J. CARVELL,Human Relations in Business, McMillan, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The subpopulations of research units do not reflect the entire S&T potential of a country. This aspect should be kept in mind while interpreting the results of this study.

  11. D. SAHAL,Invention, Innovation and Economic Evolution (No. 82-18), Graduate School of Business Administration, New York University, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. M. ANDREWS, The international study: Its data sources and measurement procedures, in: F. M. ANDREWS,op. cit. Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries, Cambridge, New York, 1979, p. 17; P. S. NAGPAUL, Conceptual and methodological problems in the measurement of research performance, in: P. S. NAGPAUL (Ed.)Organization and Efficiency of Research Groups, National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, New Delhi, 1987.

  13. P. HUNYA,A Ranking Procedure Based on Partially Ordered Sets, Kalmar Cybernetics Laboratory, JATE, Szeged (Hungary).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagpaul, P.S., Gupta, S.P. Effect of professional competence, managerial role and status of group leaders to R&D performance. Scientometrics 17, 301–331 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02026415

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02026415

Keywords

Navigation