Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On third order rotatability

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Third order rotatability of experimental designs, moment matrices and information surfaces is investigated, using a Kronecker power representation. This representation complicates the model but greatly simplifies the theoretical development, and throws light on difficulties experienced in some previous work. Third order rotatability is shown to be characterized by the finitely many transformations consisting of permutations and a bi-axial 45 degree rotation, and the space of rotatable third order symmetric matrices is shown to be of dimension 20, independent of the number of factorsm. A general Moore-Penrose inverse of a third order rotatable moment matrix is provided, leading to the information surface, and the corresponding optimality results are discussed. After a brief literature review, extensions to higher order models, the connections with tensor representations of classic matrix groups, and the evaluation of a general dimension formula, are all explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikary B, Panda R (1984) Group divisible third order rotatable designs (GDTORD). Sankhyã B46:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikary B, Panda R (1985) Group divisible response surface (GDRS) designs of third order. Calcutta Statist Assoc Bull 34:75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikary B, Panda R (1986) Construction of nearlyD-efficient third order rotatable designs using PBIB designs. Symposium on Optimization, Design of Experiments and Graph Theory, IIT, Bombay

  • Arap Koske JK (1987) A fourth order rotatable design in four dimensions. Comm Statist A16:2747–2753

    Google Scholar 

  • Arap Koske JK (1989) The variance function of the difference between two estimated fourth order response surface. J Statist Plann Inference 23:263–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Arap Koske JK, Patel MS (1986) A fourth order rotatable design in three dimensions. Comm Statist A15:3435–3444

    Google Scholar 

  • Arap Koske JK, Patel MS (1987) Construction of fourth order rotatable designs with estimation of corresponding response surface. Comm Statist A16:1361–1376

    Google Scholar 

  • Arap Koske JK, Patel MS (1989) A simpler way of obtaining non-singularity conditions of rotatability. Comm Statist A18:2489–2500

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi S (1986) A series of nearlyD-optimal third order rotatable designs. Sankhyã B48:186–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker FD, Bargmann RE (1985) Orthogonal central composite designs of the third order in the evaluation of sensitivity and plant growth simulation models. J Amer Statist Assoc 80:574–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Hunter JS (1957) Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces. Ann Math Statist 28:195–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauer R (1937) On algebras which are connected with the semisimple continuous groups. Ann of Math 38:857–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Derringer GC (1969) Sequential method for estimating response surfaces. Indus Eng Chem 61:6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper NR (1960a) Third order rotatable designs in three dimensions. Ann Math Statist 31:865–874

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper NR (1960b) A third order rotatable design in four dimensions. Ann Math Statist 31:875–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper NR (1961) Third order rotatable designs in three dimensions: some specific designs. Ann Math Statist 32:910–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper NR (1984) Schläflian rotatability. J Roy Statist Soc B46:406–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper NR, Herzberg AM (1985) Fourth order rotatability. Comm Statist B14:515–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper NR, Pukelsheim F (1990) Another look at rotatability. Technometrics 32:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper NR, Gaffke N, Pukelsheim F (1991) First and second order rotatability of experimental designs, moment matrices, and information surfaces. Metrika 38:129–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell RH, Kiefer J, Walbran A (1967) Optimum multivariate designs. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1:113–138 (Also in: Jack Carl Kiefer Collected Papers III: Design of Experiments. Springer, New York 1985, pp 247–272)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffke N, Heiligers B (1992) Computing optimal approximate invariant designs for cubic regression on multidimensional balls and cubes. Report No. 365, Institut für Mathematik, Universität Augsburg

  • Galil Z, Kiefer JC (1977) Comparison of rotatable designs for regression on balls I (quadratic). J Statist Plann Inference 1:27–40 (Also in: Jack Carl Kiefer Collected Papers III: Design of Experiments. Springer, New York 1985, pp 391–404)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galil Z, Kiefer JC (1979) Extrapolation designs and χp-optimum designs for autoregression on theq-ball. Statist Plann Inference 3:27–38 (Also in: Jack Carl Kiefer Collected Papers III: Design of Experiments Springer, New York 1985, pp 467–478)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner DA, Grandage AHE, Hader RJ (1959) Third order rotatable designs for exploring response surfaces. Ann Math Statist 30:1082–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligers B (1991) Admissibility of experimental designs in linear regression with constant term. J Statist Plann Inference 28:107–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligers B, Schneider K (1992) Invariant admissible and optimal designs in cubic regression on the ν-ball. J Statist Plann Inference 31:113–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg AM (1964) Two third order rotatable designs in four dimensions. Ann Math Statist 35:445–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg AM (1967) Cylindrically rotatable designs of types 1, 2, and 3. Ann Math Statist 38:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1981) Cylindrically rotatable designs of type 3: further considerations. Biometrical J 24:469–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1982a) Some third order rotatable designs in three dimensions. Ann Inst Statist Math 34:365–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1982b) Some third order rotatable designs. Biometrical J 24:257–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1983) Two third-order rotatable designs in four dimensions. J Statist Plann Inference 8:241–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1984) OnD-efficiency of some third-order rotatable designs. J Indian Soc Agricultural Statist 36:51–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1985) Some 212-point third-order rotatable designs in six dimensions. J Statist Res 19:63–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1987a) The construction of third-order rotatable designs ink dimensions from those in lower dimensions. Pakistan J Statist 3A:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1987b) Mixed-cylindrically rotatable designs. Pakistan J Statist 3A:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1988) A note on the analysis of third-order cylindrically rotatable designs of type 3. Pakistan J Statist 4A:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1989) Them-grouped cylindrically rotatable designs of types (1, 0,m−1), (0, 1,m−1), (1, 1,m−2) and (0, 0,m), Pakistan J Statist 5A:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S (1991) On someD 3-optimal designs in spherical regions. Comm Statist A20:2965–2985

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S, Mukerjee R (1989)D-optimal measures for fourth-order rotatable designs. Statistics 20:353–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda S, Shafiq M (1987) OnD 3-efficiency ofD-optimal fourth-order rotatable designs. Pakistan J Statist 3B:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin S, Studden WJ (1966) Tchebycheff Systems: With Applications in Analysis and Statistics. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuri AI (1988) A measure of rotatability for response-surface designs. Technometrics 30:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuri AI (1992) Diagnostic results concerning a measure of rotatability. J Roy Statist Soc B54:253–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer JC (1960) Optimum experimental designs V with applications to systematic and rotatable designs. Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1:381–405 (Also in: Jack Carl Kiefer Collected Papers III: Design of Experiments. Springer, New York 1985, pp 103–127)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee R (1987) On fourth-order rotatable designs. Comm Statist A16:1697–1702

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee R, Huda S (1985) Minimax second- and third-order designs to estimate the slope of a response surface. Biometrika 72:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee R, Huda S (1990) Fourth-order rotatable designs:A-optimal measures. Statist Prob Lett 10:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimham VL, Rao KN (1980) A modified method for the construction of third order rotatable designs through a pair of balanced incomplete block designs. Proc Second Annual ConfISTPA, Bombay December 1980.

  • Nigam AK (1967) On third order rotatable designs with smaller number of levels. J Indian Soc Agricultural Statist 19:36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Njui F, Patel MS (1988) Fifth order rotatability. Comm Statist A17:833–848

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda R (1982) Contributions to Response Surface Designs. PhD Thesis, Calcutta University

  • Panda R, Das Roy A (1990a) Analysis of fourth order rotatability ink-dimensions. Calcutta Statist Assoc Bull 39:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda R, Das Roy A (1990b) Group divisible third order rotatable designs in non-orthogonal blocks. J Indian Soc Agricultural Statist 42:189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel MS, Arap Koske JK (1985) Conditions for fourth order rotatability ink dimensions. Comm Statist A14:1343–1351

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukelsheim F (1980) Multilinear estimation of skewness and kurtosis in linear models. Metrika 27:103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukelsheim F (1993) Optimal Design of Experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaliq M, Huda S (1989) On application of association matrices in the analysis of fourth-order rotatable designs. Pakistan J Statist 5A:131–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaker PJ, Das MN (1961) Sequential third order rotatable designs for up to eleven factors. J Indian Soc Agricultural Statist 13:218–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi BN (1964) On construction of second and third order rotatable designs through pair-wise balanced and doubly balanced designs. Calcutta Statist Assoc Bull 13:150–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Wales D (1987) Eigenvalues connected to the radical of Brauer's centralizer algebras. The Arcata Conference on Representations of Finite Groups (P Fong, Ed). Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics 47, 2:547–552

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, Madison, WI, USA

    Norman R. Draper

  2. Institut für Mathematik, Universität Augsburg, 86135, Augsburg, Germany

    Friedrich Pukelsheim

Authors
  1. Norman R. Draper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Friedrich Pukelsheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Draper, N.R., Pukelsheim, F. On third order rotatability. Metrika 41, 137–161 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01895313

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01895313

Key words

Search

Navigation