Abstract
It is noted that Popper separates the creation of concepts, conjectures, hypotheses and theories—the context of invention—from the testing thereof—the context of justification—arguing that only the latter is susceptible of rigorous logical analysis. Efforts on the part of others to shift or eradicate the demarcation established by this distinction are discussed and the relationship of these considerations to the claims of “strong artificial intelligence” is pointed out. It is argued that the mode of education of scientists, as well as reports of celebrated scientists, support Popper's judgement in this matter. An historical episode from Faraday's later career is used to illustrate the historiographical strength of Lakatos' “methodology of research programs.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sir Karl Popper,The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Science Editions, New York, 1961). For a concise edited selection of this and other works by Popper organized by subject seePopper Selections D. Miller, ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1985).
T. S. Kuhn,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970);The Essential Tension (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977). See alsoScientific Revolutions Ian Hacking, ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1981).
K. Popper,Logic, pp. 31–32.
D. Miller,Popper Selections, pp. 122, 172, 177–179, 277–228.
R. S. Mansfield and T. V. Busse,The Psychology of Creativity and Discovery: Scientists and Their Work (Nelson Hall, Chicago, 1981) and references therein.
I. Lakatos, inCriticism and the Growth of Knowledge I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970), pp. 91–195; andI. Hacking, Scientific Revolutions, pp. 128–143 [reprinted from BostonStudies in the Philosophy of Science,VII, 91–136 (1970); Kuhn's response appears on pp. 137–146].
See Ref. 6.
I. Hacking, inScientific Revolutions, pp. 132 and 134, and also P. Feyerabend, p. 161.
A. Lugg,Phil. Sci. 52, 207–220 (1985).
T. Nickles,Phil. Sci. 52, 177–206 (1985); and inTheory and Experiment D. Batens and J. P. van Bendegem, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988), pp. 33–53.
T. Nickles, inTheory and Experiment (Ref. 10), p. 41.
L. P. Williams,Faraday, pp. 466–470; and J. F. Woodward, inOld and New Questions in Physics, Cosmology, Philosophy and Theoretical Biology A. van der Merwe, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1983), pp. 885–898.
In particular, L. P. Williams and F. A. J. L. James (see Ref. 9)..
O. F. Mossotti,Sur les forces qui regissent la constitution interieur des corps (Turin, 1836; English trans. in:Taylor's Scientific Memoirs 1, 448 (1839). See also J. F. Woodward (Ref. 13).
I. Hacking,Scientific Revolutions (Ref. 2), ( p. 134.
B. Latour,Science in Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1987).
E. Zahar,Einstein's Revolution: A Study in Heuristic (Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1989).
E. Zahar,Einstein's Revolution, pp. 22–23.
K. Popper,The Logic of Scientific Discovery, p. 32; and A. Einstein,Autobiographical Notes P. Schilpp, ed. (Open Court, LaSalle, 1979), pp. 6–13.
E. Zahar,Einstein's Revolution, p. 3; see also p. 125.
K. Popper, in Miller,Popper Selections, pp. 171–180, esp. p. 179. See also, for example, M. Polanyi, inKnowing and Being: Essays M. Grene, ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1969), esp. pp. 117–119.
Sharon Traweek,Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1988), pp. 74–78. See also: S. Brush,Science, p. 1170 (1974).
S. Traweek,Beamtimes, p. 79.
S. Traweek,Beamtimes, p. 77.
S. Traweek,Beamtimes, p. 75.
T. S. Kuhn,Essential Tension, p. 305.
T. S. Kuhn,Essential Tension, pp. 300–308.
M. Hesse,Models and Analogies in Science (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1966). In this connection, see also H. Yukawa,Creativity and Intuition, A Physicist Looks East and West (Kodansha, Tokyo, 1973).
These essays are edited and collected in M. Polanyi,Knowing and Being (see Ref. 22).
M. Polanyi,Knowing and Being, p. 106.
M. Polanyi,Knowing and Being, passim, esp. pp. 212–213.
M. Polanyi,Knowing and Being, p. 144.
M. Polanyi,Knowing and Being, pp. 117–119.
E. Zahar,Einstein's Revolution, p. 23.
R. Penrose,The Emperor's New Mind (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989).
G. Johnson,The Sciences (Publ. NYAS)30, 45–49 (1990).
H.-H. von Borzeszkowski and H.-J. Treder,The Meaning of Quantum Gravity (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988).
R. Penrose,Mind, p. 415.
A. Einstein,Autobiographical Notes, pp. 7 and 11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woodward, J.F. Logic of discovery or psychology of invention?. Found Phys 22, 187–203 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893611
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893611