Summary
The influence of feeding isocaloric diets containing either 65% of fructose (F 65) or 65% of glucose (G 65) were studied on the uptake of both sugars in segments of rat proximal jejunum and distal ileum. The hexose absorption was compared to that obtained in animals receiving isocaloric amounts of a diet containing 30% of glucose (G 30). Feeding fructose (F 65) for 3 days resulted in a 2.5-fold increase of fructose uptake in the jejunum and a 40% increase in the ileum as compared to group G30. When fructose (F65) was administered instead of G 65 the uptake of fructose was enhanced by 75% in the jejunum and 35% in the ileum. Stimulation of glucose absorption in segments of the proximal and distal small intestine by diets F 65 and G 65 was nearly identical as compared to the values of group G 30. The stimulation of the uptake of fructose induced by fructose feeding parallels an adaptive increase in the activity of enzymes involved in fructose metabolism in the mucosa of the small intestine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bode Ch, Bode J Ch, Ohta W, Martini GA (1980) Adaptive changes of the activity of enzymes involved in fructose metabolism in the liver and jejunal mucosa of rats following fructose feeding. Res Exp Med 178:55–63
Bode Ch, Bode JCh (1980) Adaptive changes in activities of enzymes of the carbohydrate metabolism in rat liver and jejunal mucosa to high fructose diets. Modifying effect of the fat content of the diet. Z Gastroenterol 18:38–44
Bode Ch, Dürr HK, Bode JCh (1981) Adaptive changes in the activities of enzymes of the glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and the pentose-phosphate-shunt in rat liver and jejunum following acute and chronic fructose feeding. Hormone Metabol Res (in press)
Capelli V, Pietra P (1978) Oxygen availability, dietary restriction and transport of glucose 3-O-methylglucose and fructose in the isolated small intestine of rat. Arch Int Physiol Biochim 86:217–266
Caspary WF (1975) Resorption von Kohlenhydraten und Proteinen im Dünndarm unter normalen und krankhaften Bedingungen. In: Bartelheimer H, Kühn HK, Becker V, Stelzner F (Hrsg) Gastroenterologie und Stoffwechsel. Thieme, Stuttgart
Crane RK, Mandelstam P (1960) The active transport of sugars by various preparations of hamster intestine. Biochim Biophys Acta 45:460–468
Debnam ES, Levin RJ (1976) Influence of specific dietary sugars on the jejunal mechanisms for glucose, galactose, andα-methyl glucoside absorption: evidence for multiple sugar carriers. GUT 17:92–99
Gracey M, Burke V, Oshin A (1972) Active intestinal transport of D-fructose. Biochim Biophys Acta 266:397–406
Kiyasu JY, Chaikoff IL (1957) On the manner of transport of absorbed fructose. J Biol Chem 224:935–946
MacRae AR, Neudoerffer TS (1971) Intestinal absorption and active transport. Fed Proc 30:235
Mavrias DA, Mayer RJ (1973) Metabolism of fructose in the small intestine. I. The effect of fructose feeding on fructose transport and metabolism in rat small intestine. Biochim Biophys Acta 291:531–537
Öckerman PA, Lundborg H (1965) Conversion of fructose to glucose by human jejunum absence of galactose-to-glucose conversion. Biochim Biophys Acta 105:34–42
Shoemaker WC, Yanof HM, Turk LN, Wilson TH (1962) Glucose and fructose absorption in the unanesthetized dog. Gastroenterol 44:654–663
Schultz SG, Strecker CK (1970) Fructose influx across the brush border of rabbit ileum. Biochim Biophys Acta 211:586–588
Semenza G, Mülhaupt E (1969) Studies on intestinal sucrase and sugar transport. VII. A method for measuring intestinal uptake. The absorption of the anomeric forms of some monosaccharides. Biochim Biophys Acta 173:104–112
Srivastava LM, Hübscher G (1966) Glucose metabolism in the mucosa of the small intestine. Biochem J 100:458–466
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bode, C., Eisenhardt, J.M., Haberich, F.J. et al. Influence of feeding fructose on fructose and glucose absorption in rat jejunum and ileum. Res. Exp. Med. 179, 163–168 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01851984
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01851984