Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of the treatment of cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy

Experience with 50 cases treated by means of extensive laminectomy, foraminotomy, and excision of osteophytes during the past 10 years

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper reviews management by means of the posterior approach of 50 patients with cervical myeloradiculopathy caused by spondylosis and stenosis of the spinal canal seen in the past 10 years.

Careful selection of patients is an absolute necessity since a primary cause of failure occurred in individuals who subsequently proved to have motor neurone disease. Older individuals with long-standing neurological deficits, especially long tract signs indicative of fixed lesions, were benefited primarily by a lack of further progression of their disorder and occasional improvement in hand function and gait. Diagnostic evaluation should include electromyography, nerve conduction studies, and sensory evoked cortical potentials. With the introduction of the fourth generation CAT scanning equipment, additional diagnostic information is available regarding the internal configuration of the spinal canal, its contents, and the amount of available space at various levels. Supplementary myelography remains of basic importance.

Laminectomy includes two levels above and below the areas of significant canal encroachment. Foraminal decompression with removal of only the innermost third of the foramen permits mobilization of the nerve roots, removal of osteophytes and untethering of the durai sac. A great deal of importance is attached to the preservation of the cervical lordotic curve since, with an adequate decompression and an intact dura, the cord moves dorsally into an expanded canal, rising above the ventrally situated osteophytes. In those patients with reversal of the cervical curve and swan neck deformities, posterior decompression has not been of value. Recent more radical procedures in such cases, such as vertebrectomy, remain to be evaluated. Any procedure which will permit further kyphotic deformity, such as laminectomy, is contraindicated.

Eighty-five percent of the patients operated upon by the recommended surgical approach improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aboulker, J., Metzger, J., David, M., Engel, P., Ballivet, J., Les myelopathies cervicales d'origine rachidienne. Neurochirurgie11 (1965), 88–198.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, K. L., Cervical spondylosis with accompanying myelopathy, its alleviation by removal of the bony spur. South Afr. J. Surg.6 (1968), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alsharif, H., Ezzat, Sh., Hay, A., Motty, N. A., Malek, S. A., The results of surgical treatment of spondylotic radiculomyelopathy with complete cervical laminectomy and posterior foramen magnum decompression. Acta neurochir. (Wien)48 (1979), 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradshaw, P., Some aspects of cervical spondylosis. Quart. J. Med.26 (1957), 177–208.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brieg, A., Turnbull, I., Hassler, O., Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis. A study on fresh cadaver material. J. Neurosurg.25 (1966), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Combalbert, A., Pellet, W., Indications thérapeutiques et résultats opératoires obtenus dans une série de 80 myélopathies par cervicoarthrose. Thérapeutique48 (1972), 498–501.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crandall, P. H., Batzdorf, U., Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J. Neurosurg.25 (1966), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ehni, G., Developmental variations, including shallowness of the cervical spinal canal. In: Post's, J. D.: Radiographic evaluation of the spine, Chapter 18. Masson Publishing U.S.A., Inc. 1980.

  9. Epstein, J. A., Davidoff, I. M., Chronic hypertrophic spondylosis of the cervical spine with compression of the spinal cord and nerve roots. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.35 (1951), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Epstein, J. A., Epstein, B. S., Lavine, L. S., Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The syndrome of the narrowed canal treated by laminectomy, foraminotomy, and the removal of osteophytes. Arch. Neurol.8 (1963), 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Epstein, J. A., Carras, R., Lavine, L. S., Epstein, B. S., The importance of removing osteophytes as part of the surgical treatment of myeloradiculopathy in cervical spondylosis. J. Neurosurg.30 (1969), 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein, J. A., Carras, R., Epstein, B. S., Lavine, L. S., Myelopathy in cervical spondylosis with vertebral subluxation and hyperlordosis. J. Neurosurg.32 (1970), 421–426.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Epstein, J. A., Carras, R., Hyman, R. A., Costa, S., Cervical myelopathy caused by developmental stenosis of the spinal canal. J. Neurosurg.51 (1979), 362–367.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Epstein, J. A., Marc, J. A., Hyman, R. A., Khan, A., Mardayat, M., Total myelography in the evaluation of lumbar disks. Spine4 (1979), 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Epstein, J. A., Epstein, B. S., Lumbar and cervical spinal stenosis with related cauda equina radiculopathy and myelopathy. In: Post's, J. D.: Radiographic evaluation of the spine, Chapter 31. Masson Publishing U.S.A., Inc. 1980.

  16. Fager, C. A., Results of adequate posterior decompression in the relief of spondylotic cervical myelopathy. J. Neurosurg.38 (1973), 684–692.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Galera, R. G., Tovi, D., Anterior disc excision with interbody fusion in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and rhizopathy. J. Neurosurg.28 (1968), 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Godlewski, D., Le myélopathies par sténose cervicale et par cervicoarthrose (A propos de cinquante cas opérés et revisés avec un recul de 2 à 10 ans). Cahiers de Méd.13 (1972), 1069–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gorter, K., Influence of laminectomy on the course of cervical myelopathy. Acta neurochir. (Wien)33 (1976), 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gregorius, F. K., Estrin, T., Crandall, P. H., Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy—A long term follow-up study. Arch. Neurol.33 (1976), 618–625.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guidetti, B., Fortuna, A., Long term results of surgical treatment of myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis. J. Neurosurg.30 (1969), 714–721.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Haft, H., Shenkin, H. A., Surgical end results of cervical ridge and disk problems. JAMA186 (1963), 312–315.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hinck, V. C., Sachdev, N. S., Developmental stenosis of the cervical spinal canal. Brain89 (1966), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jomin, M., Bousquet, C., Delandsheer, J.-M., Laine, E., Traitement des complications radiculomédullaires de la cervicoarthrose par la méthode de Cloward-Resultats à propos de 370 malades opérés. Neurochirurgie21 (1975), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jung, A., La chirurgie des syndromes cervicaux. Rev. Chir. Orthop.62 (Suppl. II) (1976), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lees, F., Aldren Turner, J. S., Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. Brit. Med. J.2 (1963), 1607–1610.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lunsford, L. D., Bissonette, D. J., Zorub, D. S., Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 2: Treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 32 cases. J. Neurosurg.53 (1980), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Magnaes, B., Hauge, T., Surgery for myelopathy in cervical spondylosis. Safety measures and preoperative factors related to outcome. Spine5 (1980), 211–214.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mayfield, F. H., Cervical spondylosis: A comparison of the anterior and posterior approaches. Clin. Neurosurg.13 (1965), 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Michie, R. H., Clark, M., Neurological syndrome associated with cervical and craniocervical anomalies. Arch. Neurol.18 (1968), 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nurick, S., The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain9 S (1972), 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Odom, G. L., Finney, W., Woodhall, B., Cervical disk lesions. JAMA166 (1958), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pansini, A., Lore, F., Une nouvelle technique: la somatotomie médiane longitudinale dans les myélopathies par discarthroses cervicales. Neurochirurgie18 (1972), 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Penning, L., Functional pathology of the cervical spine, p. 196. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Piepgras, D. G., Posterior decompression for myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis: laminectomy above vs. laminotomy with dentate ligament section. Clin. Neurosurg.24 (1977), 508–515.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Reed, J. D., Effects of flexion-extension movements of the head and spine upon the spinal cord and nerve roots. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat.23 (1960), 214–221.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roberts, A. H., Myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis treated by collar immobilization. Neurology16 (1966), 951–954.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rosomoff, H. L., Rossman, F., Treatment of cervical spondylosis by anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Arch. Neurol.14 (1966), 392–298.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stoops, W. L., King, R. B., Chronic myelopathy associated with cervical spondylosis. JAMA192 (1965), 281–284.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tezuka, A., Yamada, K., Ikata, T., Surgical results of cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy observed for more than five years. Tokushima J. Exp. Med.23 (1976), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thomalske, G., v. Wild, K., Lammert, E., Zur chirurgischen Behandlung der cervicalen Myelopathie. Nervenarzt43 (1972), 520–524.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Verbiest, H., Paz, Y., Geuse, H. D., Anterolateral surgery for cervical spondylosis in cases of myelopathy or nerve root compression. J. Neurosurg.25 (1966), 611–622.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Verbiest, H., Les opérations antérieures dans la cervico-arthrose et les hernies discales cervicales. Neurochirurgie16 (Suppl.) (1970), 91–122.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Verbiest, H., The management of cervical spondylosis. Clin. Neurosurg.20 (1973), 262–294.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vignon, G., Colcombet, P., Bochu, M., Masset, J.-C., Calvel, S., Meunier, P., Les myélopathies des cervicoarthroses—A propos de 14 observations personnelles dont 12 opérées. Rev. du Rhum.44 (1977), 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wolf, B. S., Khilnani, M., Malis, I., The sagittal diameter of the bony cervical spinal canal and its significance in cervical spondylosis. J. Mt. Sinai Hosp.23 (1956), 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Epstein, J.A., Janin, Y., Carras, R. et al. A comparative study of the treatment of cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Acta neurochir 61, 89–104 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01740074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01740074

Keywords

Navigation