Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The osteopathic cranial concept: fact or fiction?

  • Editorials
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

It emerges from this objective and impartial recital of the facts that the theory of “primary respiration” has no scientific basis and totally contradicts the findings of physics, anatomy, physiology, biomechanics and clinical experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNERB, 15, rue Charles Monselet, F-44000, Nantes, France

    JC Ferré & JY Barbin

Authors
  1. JC Ferré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. JY Barbin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferré, J., Barbin, J. The osteopathic cranial concept: fact or fiction?. Surg Radiol Anat 13, 165–170 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01627979

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01627979

Search

Navigation