Abstract
Two-hundred and fifteen isolates ofMycobacterium tuberculosis were evaluated with the BACTEC 460 radiometric method for susceptibility to isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and streptomycin (SM); a revised protocol for inoculum preparation was used. Fresh clinical isolates were subcultured into 7H9 broth and then photometrically adjusted to the equivalent of a 0.5 McFarland standard, one-half the recommended inoculum density. This method produced an overall 98.3% correlation with a conventional agar method. The sensitivity of this procedure was good for all drugs tested except for the lowest concentration of SM (2 μg/ml). Specificity was excellent for all drugs tested. After repeat testing, only four discrepancies were found, yielding a 99.8% correlation between the two systems. The time required for susceptibility tests averaged 4.6 days. This method for inoculum preparation effectively minimized the number of susceptibility tests exceeding the threshold value before the fourth day of incubation. This allowed for definite trends of the growth index values to become established before interpretation of results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Hawkins JE (1986) Nonweekend schedule for BACTEC drug susceptibility testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 23:934–937
Laszlo A, Gill P, Handzel V, Hodgkin MM, Helbecque DM (1983) Conventional and radiometric drug susceptibility testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Clin Microbiol 18:1335–1339
Roberts GD, Goodman NL, Heifets L, Larsh HW, Lindner TH, McClatchy JK, McGinnis MR, Siddiqi SH, Wright P (1983) Evaluation of the BACTEC radiometric method for recovery of mycobacteria and drug susceptibility testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosis from acid-fast smear-positive specimens. J Clin Microbiol 18:689–696
Siddiqi SH, Libonati JP, Middlebrook G (1981) Evaluation of a rapid radiometric method for drug susceptibility testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 13:908–912
Siddiqi SH, Hawkins JE, Laszlo A (1985) Interlaboratory drug susceptibility testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosis by a radiometric procedure and two conventional methods. J Clin Microbiol 22:919–923
Snider DE Jr, Good RC, Kilburn JO, Laskowski LF Jr, Lusk RH, Marr JJ, Regginardo Z, Middlebrook G (1981) Rapid drug-susceptibility testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 123:402–406
Steadham JE (1982) Lyophilized, color-coded anti-mycobacterial drugs for susceptibility testing. Public Health Lab 40:145–148
Steadham JE, Stall SK, Simmank JL (1985) Use of the BACTEC system for drug susceptibility testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosis, M. kansasii, andM. avium complex. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 3:33–40
Tarrand JJ, Groschel DHM (1985) Evaluation of the BACTEC radiometric method for the detection of 1% resistant populations ofMycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 21:941–946
Toman K (1981) Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of diagnostic tests. Bull Int Union Tuberc 56:18–28
Vestal AL (1975) Procedures for the isolation and identification of mycobacteria. U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare publication no. (CDC) 76-8230. Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta
Vincké G, Yegers O, Vanachter H, Jenkins PA, Butzler J (1982) Rapid susceptibility testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosis by a radiometric technique. J Antimicrob Chemother 10:351–354
Woodley CL (1986) Evaluation of streptomycin and ethambutol concentrations for susceptibility testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosis by radiometric and conventional procedures. J Clin Microbiol 23:385–386
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stager, C.E., Davis, J.R., Saccomani, M.N. et al. Modified inoculum for radiometric susceptibility testing ofMycobacterium tuberculosis . Current Microbiology 17, 243–247 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01571322
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01571322