Skip to main content
Log in

Mutants of CHO cells resistant to the protein synthesis inhibitor emetine: Genetic and biochemical characterization of second-step mutants

  • Published:
Somatic Cell Genetics

Abstract

Second-step mutants highly resistant to the protein synthesis inhibitor emetine (EmtRII) have been selected from emetine resistant (EmtRI) Chinese hamster ovary cells described earlier. The frequency of the EmtRII mutants was increased 50- to 75-fold after mutagenesis, and none of these highly resistant mutants could be selected in one step using wild-type cells. Like the EmtRI mutants, the increased resistance of EmtRII mutants results from another lesion in the polyribosomal fraction, as measured by the effects of emetine in fractionated extracts. As with the first-step mutants, the EmtRII isolates behave recessively in somatic cell hybrids. Segregation studies have shown that the EmtR lesions are not on the X chromosome, and in at least one isolate there is evidence that the EmtRI and EmtRII mutations may occur at different sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Gupta, R. S., and Siminovitch, L. (1976).Cell 9:213–219.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grollman, A. P., and Jarkovsky, Z. (1974). inAntibiotics, Vol. 4, (edited by F. Hahn and J. W. Corcoran) Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 420–435.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pestka, S. (1971).Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 25:487–562.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta, R. S., and Siminovitch, L. (1977).Cell 10:61–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McLaughlin, C. (1974). inRibosomes, (edited by M. Nomura, A. Tissieres and P. Lengyel), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp. 815–827.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, R. S., and Siminovitch, L. (1977).Biochemistry,16:3209–3214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson, L. H., and Baker, R. M. (1973). InMethods in Cell Biology, Vol. 6, (edited by D. M. Prescott, Academic Press, New York, pp. 209–281.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stanners, C. P., Elicieri, G. L., and Green, H. (1971).Nature (London) New Biol. 230:52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McBurney, M. W., and Whitmore, G. F. (1974).Cell 2:173–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bockstahler, L. E., and Kaesberg, P. (1965).J. Mol. Biol. 13:127–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baker, R. M., Brunette, D. M., Mankovitz, R., Thompson, L. H., Whitmore, G. F., Siminovitch, L., and Till, J. E. (1974).Cell 1:9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chasin, L. A. (1972).Nature (London) New Biol. 240:50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marin, G. (1969).Exp. Cell Res. 57:29–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris, M. (1975).J. Cell. Physiol. 86:413–430.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, J. F., and Whitmore, G. F. (1977).Somat. Cell Genet. 3:173–193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farrell, S. A., and Worton, R. G. (1977).Somat. Cell Genet. 3:539–551.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beaudet, A. L., Roufa, D. J., and Caskey, C. T. (1973).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:320–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morrow, J. (1970).Genetics 65:279–287.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Littlefield, J. W. (1963).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 50:568–576.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schlessinger, D. (1974).Annu. Rev. Genet. 8:135–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jaskunas, R., Nomura, M., and Davies, J. (1976). InRibosomes, (edited by M. Nomura, A. Tissieres, and P. Lengyel), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp. 333–368.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Siminovitch, L. (1976).Cell 7:1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Deaven, L. L., and Peterson, D. F. (1973).Chromosoma 41:129–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Worton, R. G., Ho, C. C., and Duff, C. (1977).Somat. Cell Genet. 3:27–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chasin, L. A., and Urlaub, G. (1975).Science 187:1091–1093.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wool, I. G., and Stoffler, G. (1974). InRibosomes, (edited by M. Nomura, A. Tissieres, and P. Lengyel), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp. 417–460.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Apirion, D., and Schlessinger, D. (1969).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 63:794–799.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saltzmann, L. A., Brown, M., and Apirion, D. (1974).Mol. Gen. Genet. 133:201–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sypherd, P. S., and Osawa, S. (1974). InRibosomes, (edited by M. Nomura, A. Tissieres, and P. Lengyel), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp. 669–678.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, R.S., Siminovitch, L. Mutants of CHO cells resistant to the protein synthesis inhibitor emetine: Genetic and biochemical characterization of second-step mutants. Somat Cell Mol Genet 4, 77–94 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01546494

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01546494

Keywords

Navigation