Skip to main content
Log in

HEC consortium survey: Current perspectives of physicians and nurses

  • Article
  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the request of the Midwest Bioethics Center (MBC), we surveyed nurses' and physicians' attitudes and needs regarding Hospital Ethics Committees (HECs). The primary objective of this research project was to inform the practices and policies of the Ethics Committee Consortium of the Bioethics Center.

Four thousand eight hundred and twenty-nine surveys were distributed to the medical and nursing staff of eight Kansas City metropolitan area hospitals. One thousand and fifty-five surveys were returned, representing a response rate of 21%.

This survey examined five areas believed to be related to nurse and physician use of and participation on HECs: [1] Training in Biomedical Ethics; [2] Nature and Purpose of HECs; [3] HEC Functions-Case Consultation; [4] Ethical Decision-Making and Patient Care; and [5] Continuing Education. Important findings include lack of knowledge regarding whether case review is required or optional, and whether recommendations are binding or advisory; a perception that training in medical ethics was inadequate; and a strong indication that HECs should be accessible. These findings are consistent with and extend the findings of prior descriptive research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Finkenbine R, Gramelspacher G. Physicians' attitudes toward hospital ethics committees.Indiana Medicine 1991;84(11):804–807.

    Google Scholar 

  2. La Puma J. Clinical ethics, mission, and vision: Practical wisdom in health care.Hospital & Health Services Administration. 1990;35(3):321–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heckman RE. Hospital ethics committees and the physician.Delaware Medical Journal. 1989;61(12):679–80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bushy A, Raugh JR. Implementing an ethics committee in rural institutions.JONA. 1991;21(12):18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffman DE. Does legislating hospital ethics committees make a difference? A study of hospital ethics committees in Maryland, the District of Columbia, and Virginia.Law, Medicine & Health Care. 1991;19(1–2):105–19.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy P. The role of the nurse on hospital ethics committees.Nursing Clinics of North America. 1989;24(2):551–56.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gramelspacher GP. Institutional ethics committees and case consultation: Is there a role?Issues in Law and Medicine. 1991;7(1):73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blake DC. The hospital ethics committee: Health care's moral conscience or white elephant?Hastings Center Report. 1992;22(1):6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feutz-Harter SA. Ethics committees: A resource for patient care decision-making.JONA. 1991;21(4):11–12,44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment: Ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office; 1983.

  11. Andereck WS. Development of a hospital ethics committee: Lessons from five years of case consultations.Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1992;1:41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Curtis J. Multidisciplinary input on institutional ethics committees: A nursing perspective.Quality Review Bulletin. 1984;10(9):199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Youngner SJ. A national survey of hospital ethics committees.Critical Care Medicine. 1983;11:902–905.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Storch JL, Griener GG, Marshall DA,et al. Ethics committees in Canadian hospitals: Report of the 1989 survey.Healthcare Management. 1990;3(4):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson JA. Ethics committees in hospitals: Alternative structures and responsibilities.Issues in Law & Medicine. 1991;7(1):83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nevins MA. New Jersey's 15-year experiment in altered physician-patient relations.New Jersey Medicine. 1992;89(4):297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Griener GG, Storch JL. Hospital ethics committees: Problems in evaluation.HEC Forum. 1992;4(1):5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stadler, H.A., Morrissey, J.M., Williams-Rice, B. et al. HEC consortium survey: Current perspectives of physicians and nurses. HEC Forum 6, 269–289 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463339

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463339

Key words

Navigation