Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of chess research on cognitive science

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Although chess research has not been a mainstream activity in cognitive science, it has had a significant impact on this field because of the experimental and theoretical tools it has provided. The two most-cited references in chess research, de Groot (1965) and Chase and Simon (1973 a), have accumulated over 250 citations each (SSCI andSCI sources summed), with the majority of citations coming a decade or more from their publication dates. Both works are frequently cited in contemporary cognitive-psychology textbooks. Chess playing provides a model task environment for the study of basic cognitive processes, such as perception, memory, and problem solving. It also offers a unique opportunity for the study of individual differences (chess expertise) because of Elo's (1965, 1978) development of a chess-skill rating scale. Chess has also enjoyed a privileged position in Artificial-Intelligence research as a model domain for exploring search and evaluation processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, F., & Starkes, J. L. (1980). Perception in sport: Volleyball.Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard, F., Graham, S., & Paarsalu, M. E. (1980). Perception in sport: Basketball.Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1990).Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, M. H. (1989).Human memory and cognition. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelder, W. H., & Bershad, N. J. (1979). The statistical analysis of a Thurstonian model for rating chess players.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, A. L. (1985). The skill of recognizing musical structures.Memory & Cognition, 13, 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, H. (1978). A chronology of computer chess and its literature.Artificial Intelligence, 10, 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, H. (1979). The B* tree search algorithm: A best-first proof procedure.Artificial Intelligence, 12, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, H. J. (1981). Search vs. knowledge: An analysis from the domain of games. Paper presented at the NATO Symposium on Human and Artificial Intelligence, Lyons, France, October, 1981. Available as CMU-CS-82-103 from Computer Science Department, Carnegie-Mellon University.

  • Berliner, H., & Ebeling, C. (1989). Pattern knowledge and search: The SUPREM architecture.Artificial Intelligence, 38, 161–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. B. (1989).Cognitive psychology (2nd ed.). Saint Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A. (1894).Psychologie des grands calculateurs et joueurs d'échecs. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A. (1966). Mnemonic virtuosity: A study of chess players.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 74, 127–162. Translated fromRevue des Deux Mondes, 117, 826–859,(1893).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, L. E., Dominowski, R. L., Loftus, E. F., & Healey, A. F. (1986).Cognitive processes (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramer, M. A. (1982). Pattern-based representations of knowledge in the game of chess.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 16, 439–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderwood, B., Klein, G. A., & Crandall, B. W. (1988). Time pressure, skill, and move quality in chess.American Journal of Psychology, 101, 481–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N. (1976). Memory for chess positions: Resistance to interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 641–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N. (1979). Components of skill in bridge.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N. (1981 a). Aging and skilled problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N. (1981 b). Search in chess: Age and skill differences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 467–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N. (1981 c). Visual short-term memory and aging in chess players.Journal of Gerontology, 36, 615–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N. (1989). Expertise in chess and bridge. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.),Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 183–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973 a). Perception in chess.Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973b). The mind's eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1978). Knowledge structures and memory development. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.),Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 73–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. R. B. (1989). Adversary problem solving by machine. In K. J. Gilhooly (Ed.),Human and machine problem solving (pp. 57–81). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, A. A. (1907). The psychology of chess and of learning to play it.American Journal of Psychology, 18, 269–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranberg, L., & Albert, M. L. (1988). The chess mind. In L. K. Obler & D. Fein (Eds.),The exceptional brain. Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 156–190). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, A. D. (1965).Thought and choice in chess (2nd ed. 1978). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, J., & Mayr, U. (1987). Intelligenz and Schachleistung — eine Untersuchung an Schachexperten.Psychologische Beitrdge, 29, 270–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, D. E., & Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings.Memory & Cognition, 7, 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S. H. (1973). Structure and experience in the matching and reproduction of chess patterns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University. Dissertation Abstracts 73–26, 954.

  • Ellis, H. C., & Hunt, R. R. (1989).Fundamentals of human memory and cognition (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo, A. E. (1965). Age changes in master chess performances.Journal of Gerontology, 20, 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo, A. E. (1978).The rating of chessplayers, past and present. New York: Arco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984).Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W. (1986).A handbook of cognitive psychology. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, A. D., & Lloyd, S. J. (1988). The role of stimulus-to-rule consistency in learning rapid application of spatial rules.Human Factors, 30, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellatly, A. (1986).The skillful mind. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986).Cognition (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, S. E. (1978 a). Effects of orienting tasks on recognition of chess positions.American Journal of Psychology, 91, 659–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, S. E. (1978b). Memory for the ordinary: Typicality effects in chess memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 605–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, S. E. (1979). Recognition memory for chess positions: Some preliminary research.American Journal of Psychology, 92, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (1987).Memory, thinking, and language: Topics in cognitive psychology. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D. H. (1979). The evaluation of chess positions.Simulation and Games, 10, 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D. H. (1985).The psychology of chess skill. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D. H. (1988). Evaluation factors in human tree search.American Journal of Psychology, 102, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D. H. (1989 a). Search during speed chess. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society Meetings, Atlanta.

  • Holding, D. H. (1989b). Adversary problem solving by Humans. In K. J. Gilhooly (Ed.),Human and machine problem solving (pp. 83–122). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D. H. (1989c). Counting backward during chess move choice.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 421–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D. H., & Pfau, H. D. (1985). Thinking ahead in chess.American Journal of Psychology, 98, 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D. H., & Reynolds, R. I. (1982). Recall or evaluation of chess positions as determinants of chess skill.Memory & Cognition, 10 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., & Whyld, K. (1984).The Oxford companion to chess. Oxford: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, D. D., & Morgan, D. (1990). Chess expertise in children.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, F., Anantharaman, T., Campbell, M., & Nowatzyk, A. (1990). A grandmaster chess machine.Scientific American, 263, 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. M., & Robertson, L. (1979). The generality of the levels of processing hypothesis: An application to memory for chess positions.Memory & Cognition, 7, 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, H. C. (1953).Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lories, G. (1987). Recall of random and non random chess positions in strong and weak chess players.Psychologica Belgica, 27, 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlin, M. W. (1989).Cognition (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milojkovic, J. D. (1982). Chess imagery in novice and master.Journal of Mental Imagery 6, 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1973). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.).Visual information processing (pp. 283–308). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972).Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J. (1986). Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning.Cognitive Science, 10, 91–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfau, H. D., & Murphy, M. D. (1988). Role of verbal knowledge in chess skill.American Journal of Psychology, 101, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. D., Campbell, K. M., & Campbell, D. J. (1977). Effects of extrinsic financial rewards on intrinsic motivation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K. (1988).Cognition: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma, P. (1985). Chess players' intake of task-relevant cues.Memory & Cognition, 13, 385–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma, P. (1989). Chess players' recall of auditorally presented chess positions.European Journal of Psychology, 1, 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma, P. (1990a). Apperception and restructuring in chess players' problem solving. In K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. G. Keane, R. H. Logie, & G. Erdos (Eds.),Lines of thinking: Reflections on the psychology of thought (Vol. 2, pp. 41–57). London: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma, P. (1990b). Chess players' search for task relevant cues: Are chunks relevant? In D. Brogan (Ed.),Visual search (pp. 115–121). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, A. J. (1985).Cognition and cognitive psychology. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, J. (1986). Experiments in search and knowledge. Technical Report TR 86-12, Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, (Ph. D. thesis from University of Waterloo, May 1986).

  • Simon, H. A., & Barenfeld, M. (1969). Information processing analysis of perceptual processes in problem solving.Psychological Review, 76, 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., & Chase, W. G. (1973). Skill in chess.American Scientist, 61, 394–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., & Gilmartin, K. (1973). A simulation of memory for chess positions.Cognitive Psychology, 5, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems. In R. Siegler (Ed.),Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 325–348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, M. M., Morris, P. E., Levy, P., & Ellis, A. W. (1987).Cognition in action. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solso, R. L. (1988).Cognitive psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikhomirov, O. K., & Poznyanskaya, E. (1966). An investigation of visual search as a means of analyzing heuristics.Soviet Psychology, 5, 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikhomirov, O. K., & Vinogradov, Yu. E. (1970). Emotions in the heuristic function.Soviet Psychology, 8, 198–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente, K. J., & de Groot, A. D. (1990). The memory recall paradigm: Straightening out the historical record.American Psychologist, 45, 285–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A., & Scurrah, M. J. (1971). Some characteristics of human problem-solving in chess.Cognitive Psychology, 2, 454–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. J., Schwartz, D. R., & Lane, D. M. (1984). Does part-set cueing test for memory organization? Evidence from reconstruction of chess positions.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 498–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, D. (1983). Using chess knowledge to reduce search. In P. W. Frey (Ed.),Chess skill in man and machine (2nd ed., pp. 211–242). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of Waterloo, N2L 3GI, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Neil Charness

Authors
  1. Neil Charness
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charness, N. The impact of chess research on cognitive science. Psychol. Res 54, 4–9 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01359217

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01359217

Keywords

Search

Navigation