Skip to main content
Log in

“Do Winograd and Flores have politics?”

  • Commentary Section
  • Commentary
  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Callon, Michel (1986): Some elements in the politics of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay. InPower, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, ed. John Law, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 196–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, Fernando, M. Graves, B. Hartfield and T. Winograd (1988): Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction.ACM Transactions of Office Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1977): A review of Gadamer'sTruth and Method. InUnderstanding and Social Inquiry, eds. Fred Dallmayr and Thomas McCarthy, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 335–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1984):The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. I, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Thomas McCarthy (trans.) Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1984):The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol II, Lifeworld and System. Thomas McCarthy (trans.) Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayyusi, Lena (1984):Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (1988):The Pasteurization of France, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael (1985): Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility.Social Studies of Science, vol. 15, pp. 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, Harvey (1972a): An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. InStudies in Social Interaction, ed., David Sudnow, New York: Free Press, pp. 31–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, Harvey (1972b): On the analyzability of stories by children. In:Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnorgraphy of Communication, eds. J.J. Gumperz and Delt Hymes, New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, pp. 329–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R (1969):Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Lucy (1994): Do categories have politics?: The language/action perspective reconsidered.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 2, pp. 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, Terry (1994) Categories disciplines and social coordination.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 2, pp. 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, Terry, and Fernando Flores (1986):Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogen, D. “Do Winograd and Flores have politics?”. Comput Supported Coop Work 3, 79–83 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01305851

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01305851

Key words

Navigation