Skip to main content
Log in

Adverbial quantification over events

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper gives an analysis of the adverbial quantifiers exemplified in “I regretted it every time I had dinner with him.” Sentences of this kind display what I call a ‘matching effect’; they are true if every event in the denotation oftime I had dinner with him can be matched with an event regretting that dinner event. They are thus truth-conditionally equivalent to sentences of the form “There are at least as many As as Bs.” The difficulties of giving a compositional interpretation to sentences of this form have been discussed in, e.g., Boolos 1981. I first show that the matching effect is semantic and not pragmatic. I then give an analysis of these sentences in a neo-Davidsonian framework, interpreting the adverbials as quantifiers over events. Syntactically they are analyzed as objects of a null preposition. This allows a simple compositional semantic interpretation in which the null preposition is interpreted exactly as other prepositions are by Davidson (1967), namely as denoting a function from the event argument of the matrix verb to the prepositional object. The matching effect then follows automatically. I extend the analysis to account for other sentences which directly instantiate the schema “For every A there is a B” and its equivalents, and show how the matching effect follows in general from the functional nature of thematic roles and prepositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boolos, George: 1981, ‘For every A there is a B’,Linguistic Inquiry 12(3), 465–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan: 1982, ‘Polyadicity’, in J. Bresnan (ed.),The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condoravdi, Cleo: 1992, ‘Individual-Level Predicates in Conditional Clauses’, paper presented at the LSA meeting, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Davidson, Donald: 1967, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, reprinted in D. Davidson, 1980,Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 105–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1978,Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1985, ‘On Semantics’,Linguistic Inquiry 16(4), 547–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, Erhardt: 1986, ‘Temporal Anaphora in Discourses of English’,Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Hoop, Helen and Henriette de Swart: 1992, ‘Indefinite Objects’, in R. Bok-Bennema and P. Coopmans (eds.),Linguistics in the Netherlands, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.),Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam Mathematical Centre, part 1, pp. 277–321. Reprinted in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.), 1984,Truth, Interpretation and Information, GRASS 2, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1989, ‘Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred: 1993, ‘Events and Plurality’, ms., Tel Aviv University and Cornell University.

  • Larson, Richard: 1985, ‘Bare-NP Adverbs’,Linguistic Inquiry 16(4), 595–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. L. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1987, ‘Algebraic Semantics of Event Structures’, in J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof and F. Veltman (eds.),Proceedings of the Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, Amsterdam, pp. 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, Louise: 1992, ‘Adjunct Predicates and the Individual/Stage Distinction’, ms., Indiana University.

  • Parsons, Terence: 1990,Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul and Geoffrey Pullum: 1988, ‘Expletive Noun Phrases in Subcategorized Positions’,Linguistic Inquiry 19(4), 635–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, Gregory: 1985,The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

For comments on earlier drafts of this paper, I should like to thank two anonymous reviewers, Angelika Kratzer and Irene Heim, Fred Landman, and audiences at Cornell University and the Eighth Annual Conference of the Israeli Association for Theoretical

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothstein, S. Adverbial quantification over events. Nat Lang Seman 3, 1–31 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01252883

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01252883

Keywords

Navigation