Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Habitat-specific estimates of competition in stream salmonids: A field test of the isodar model of habitat selection

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The population densities of sympatric Atlantic salmon,Salmo salar and brook charr,Salvelinus fontinalis, were measured in riffle and pool stream habitats to test whether non-linear isodars, a multispecific model of habitat selection based on ideal distribution assumptions, could (1) predict the distribution of densities between habitats and (2) reproduce the processes postulated to underlie spatial segregation and species interactions in previous laboratory and field studies. The model provided a good fit to observed density patterns and indicated that habitat suitability declined non-linearly with increased heterospecific competitor densities. Competitive effects in riffles appeared to be due to exploitative resource use, with salmon always emerging as the superior competitor. No evidence was found for interference competition in riffles. In contrast, interspecific competition in pools seemed to occur through exploitation and interference. The specific identity of the superior competitor in pools depended on the density of both species; pools provided the charr with refuge from competition with the salmon, presumably through the adoption by the charr of density-dependent behaviours, such as schooling and group foraging, that mitigated the negative impact of the salmon. Charr were displaced from the riffles toward the pools as the total salmon density increased. The isodar analysis, based on limited density data, successfully reproduced the processes suggested to underlie spatial segregation in previous field and laboratory studies and provided new insights into how changes in competitor densities modify habitat suitability in this system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Pinshow, B., Brown, J.S., Kotler, B. and Mitchell, W.A. (1990) Habitat selection: an experimental field test with two gerbil species.Ecology 71, 2358–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlin, T., Hamrin, S., Heggbert, T.G., Rasmussen, G. and Saltveit, S.J. (1989) Electrofishing—theory and practice with special emphasis on salmonids.Hydrobiologia 173, 9–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A. and Dooley, J.L., Jr (1991) Landscape composition and the intensity and outcome of twospecies competition.Oikos 60, 180–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle, F.L. and Strub, M.R. (1978) A new method for estimating population size from removal data.Biometrics 34, 621–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, B.J. (1991) Communities in a landscape: the influence of habitat heterogeneity on the interactions between species.Am. Nat. 138, 1105–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy.Stat. Sci.,1, 54–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flack, V.F. and Chang, P.C. (1987) Frequency of selecting noise variables in subset regression analysis: a simulation study.Am. Stat. 41, 84–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S.A. (1985) Group foraging by a coral reef fish: a mechanism for gaining access to defended resources.Anim. Behav. 33, 782–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (1983) A note on screening regression equations.Am. Stat. 37, 152–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S.D. and Lucas, H.L., Jr (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development.Acta Biotheor. 19, 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W.A. (1987)Measurement Error Models. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R.J. (1973) Interactions of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill). InProceedings of the International Atlantic Salmon Symposium 1972 (M.W. Smith and W.M. Carter, eds), pp. 181–202. International Atlantic Salmon Foundation.

  • Gibson, R.J. (1981) Behavioral interactions between coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri), at the juvenile fluviatile stages.Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1029.

  • Gibson, R.J. (1993) The Atlantic salmon in fresh water: spawning, rearing and production.Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 3, 39–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J.W.A. and Noakes, D.L.G. (1988) Aggressiveness and foraging mode of young-of-the-year brook charr,Salvelinus fontinalis (Pisces, Salmonidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22, 435–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, W.E. (1987) Interspecific competition and habitat segregation among stream-dwelling trout and salmon: a review.Fisheries 12, 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacelnik, A., Krebs, J.R. and Bernstein, C. (1992) The ideal free distribution and predator—prey populations.Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 50–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, H. (1958) Observations in a stream tank of territoriality and competition in juvenile salmon and trout (Salmo salar L. andS. trutta L.).Rep. Inst. Freshwater Res. Drottningholm 39, 55–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix, G.L. (1989) Production of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in two acidic rivers of Nova Scotia.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46, 2003–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, L.R. and Maynard Smith, J. (1976) The coevolution and stability of competing species.Am. Nat. 110, 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, B.H. (1988) The structural relationship: regression in biology.Can. J. Zool. 66, 2329–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicol, R.E. and Noakes, D.L.G. (1984) Environmental influences on territoriality of juvenile brook charr,Salvelinus fontinalis, in a stream environment.Environ. Biol. Fish. 10, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicol, R.E., Scherer, E. and Murkin, E.J. (1985) Quantitative field investigations of feeding and territorial behaviour of young-of-the-year brook charr,Salvelinus fontinalis.Environ. Biol. Fish. 12, 219–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M. and Parker, G.A. (1991) Competition for resources. InBehavioral ecology (J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies, eds), pp. 137–68. Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.C. and Peck, E.A. (1982)Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W. (1987) Tests of density-dependent habitat selection in a patchy environment.Ecol. Monogr. 57, 269–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W. (1988) Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure.Evol. Ecol. 2, 253–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W. (1989a) Habitat-dependent estimates of competitive interaction.Oikos 55, 111–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W. (1989b) Density-dependent habitat selection: testing the theory with fitness data.Evol. Ecol. 3, 80–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W. (1990) Temporal variation, habitat selection and community structure.Oikos 59, 303–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W. (1992) Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes.Evol. Ecol. 6, 412–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S.L., Rosenzweig, M.L. and Mitchell, W. (1985) Competition and food selection: field tests of a theory.Ecology 66, 798–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, G. (1980) The brook charr,Salvelinus fontinalis. InCharrs (E.K. Balon, ed.), pp. 141–204, W. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H.R. and Danielson, B.J. (1991) Sources, sinks and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics.Am. Nat. 137, S50-S66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R.G. (1982) Emergence, population densities and growth of salmon and trout fry in two New Brunswick streams.Can. J. Zool. 60, 2239–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. (1979) Optimal habitat selection in two species competitive systems.Fortschr. Zool. 25, 283–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. (1981) A theory of habitat selection.Ecology 62, 327–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. (1986) Hummingbird isolegs in an experimental system.Behav. Biol. Sociobiol. 19, 313–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. (1991) Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism.Am. Nat. 137, S5-S28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. and Abramsky, Z. (1985) Detecting density-dependent habitat selection.Am. Nat. 126, 405–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. and Abramsky, Z. (1986) Centrifugal community organization.Oikos 46, 339–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R.L. and Gee, J.H. (1964) Movements of young Atlantic salmon in a small stream.J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 21, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W.J. (1983) Aggregation and the ‘ideal free’ distribution.J. Anim. Ecol. 52, 821–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W.J. and Parker, G.A. (1992) The relationship between continuous input and interference models of ideal free distributions with unequal competitors.Anim. Behav. 44, 345–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wankowski, J.W.J. and Thorpe, J.E. (1979) Spatial distribution and feeding in Atlantic salmon,Salmo salar L. juveniles.J. Fish. Biol. 14, 239–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, P. (1992) Inference after variable selection in linear regression models.Biometrika 79, 741–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département de biologie et des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec à Rimouski, CP 3300, G5L 3A1, Rimouski, Québec, Canada

    Marco A. Rodríguez

Authors
  1. Marco A. Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodríguez, M.A. Habitat-specific estimates of competition in stream salmonids: A field test of the isodar model of habitat selection. Evol Ecol 9, 169–184 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237755

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237755

Keywords

Search

Navigation