Abstract
We argue against the common view that it is impossible to give a causal account of the distant correlations that are revealed in EPR-type experiments. We take a realistic attitude about quantum mechanics which implies a willingness to modify our familiar concepts according to its teachings. We object to the argument that the violation of factorizability in EPR rules out causal accounts, since such an argument is at best based on the desire to retain a classical description of nature that consists of processes that are continuous in space and time. We also do not think special relativity prohibits the superluminal propagation of causes in EPR, for the phenomenon of quantum measurement may very well fall outside the domain of application of special relativity. It is possible to give causal accounts of EPR as long as we are willing to take quantum mechanics seriously, and we offer two such accounts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bohr, N.: 1949, ‘Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics’, in Paul A. Schilpp (ed.),Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, The Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston, pp. 200–241.
Butterfield, J.: 1989, ‘A Space-Time Approach to the Bell Inequality’, in James T. Cushing and Ernan McMullin (eds.),Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp. 114–144.
Cartwright, N.: 1991, ‘Quantum Probabilities and the Principle of the Common Cause’, forthcoming in C. Poser (ed.), Berlin, forthcoming volume on the Reichenbach Centennial.
Cartwright, N.: forthcoming, ‘Marks and Probabilities: Two Ways to Find Causal Structure’, Vienna Summer 1991 Conference on Reichenbach, Zilsel, and Carnap.
Cartwright, N. and M. Jones.: forthcoming, ‘How to Hunt Quantum Causes’,Erkenntnis, special volume on Reichenbach.
Glymour, C.,et al.: forthcoming book on causal structures.
Leggett, A. J.: 1987, ‘Reflections on the Quantum Measurement Paradox’, in B. J. Hiley and F. David Peat (eds.),Quantum Implications, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 85–104.
McCall, S.: forthcoming, ‘Causation and Laws of Nature’.
Skyrms, B.: 1984, ‘EPR: Lessons for Metaphysics’, in Peter A. French,et al. (eds.),Causation and Causal Theories, Midwest Studies in Philosophy IX, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 245–255.
Spohn, W.: forthcoming, ‘On Reichenbach's Principle of the Common Cause’, in W. C. Salmon and G. Walters (eds.),Proceedings of the First Pittsburgh-Konstanz Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science in May 1991.
Swann, W. F. G.: 1929, ‘Wave Mechanics’,Journal of the Franklin Institute 207, 457–464.
van Fraassen, B.: 1991,Quantum Mechanics:an Empiricist View, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We would like to thank Jeremy Butterfield and Christoph Lehner for comments on earlier drafts.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, H., Cartwright, N. Causality and realism in the EPR experiment. Erkenntnis 38, 169–190 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128978
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128978