Skip to main content
Log in

Classical physical abstraction

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An informal theory is set forth of relations between abstract entities, includingcolors, physical quantities, times, andplaces in space, and the concrete things thathave them, or areat orin them, based on the assumption that there are close analogies between these relations and relations between abstractsets and the concrete things that aremembers of them. It is suggested that even standard scientific usage of these abstractions presupposes principles that are analogous to postulates of abstraction, identity, and other fundamental principles of set theory. Also discussed is the significance of important disanalogies between sets and physical abstractions, including especiallymodal andtemporal aspects of physical abstractions, which is related to the problem of the characterizingconstancy, of colors, physical attributes, and locations in space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, E. W.: 1966, ‘On the Nature and Purpose of Measurement’,Synthese 16, 125–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, E. W.: 1974, ‘On the Naive Conception of the Topology of the Surface of a Body’, in P. Suppes (ed.),Space, Time and Geometry, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 402–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, E. W.: 1984, ‘On the Superficial’,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65, 386–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, E. W.: 1986, ‘On the Dimensionality of Surfaces, Solids, and Spaces’,Erkenntnis 24, 137–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1991,The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by R. McKeon, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chihara, C. S.: 1984, ‘A Simple Theory of Types Without Platonic Domains’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 13, 249–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chihara, C. S.: 1990,Constructibility and Mathematical Existence, Oxford University Press.

  • Claggett, M.: 1968,Nicole Oresme and the Geometry of Qualities and Motions, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1980,Science Without Numbers, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1884,Foundations of Arithmetic, translation by J. L. Austin, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo: 1638,Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences, translation by H. Crew and A. de Salvio, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, T.: 1956,The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. v.: 1887, ‘Numbering and Measuring from an Epistemological Viewpoint’, translation by M. F. Lowe, in R. S. Cohen and Y. Elkana,Hermann von Helmholtz. Epistemological Writings, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 72–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D.: 1902,Foundations of Geometry, translation by E. J. Townsend, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1787,Critique of Pure Reason, translation by Norman Kemp Smith, St Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. L.: 1955,General Topology, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P. and Tversky, A.: 1970,Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. C.: 1877,Matter and Motion, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey, J. J. C., Sugar, A. C. and Suppes, P.: 1953, ‘Axiomatic Foundations of Classical Particle Mechanics’,Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis Vol.2 pp. 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, E. and Claggett, M.: 1952,The Medieval Science of Weights, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Sir Isaac: 1725,Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Motte translation revised by F. Cajori, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. v. O.: 1960,Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1905, ‘On Denoting’,Mind XIV, 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J.: 1971,The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1980The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H.: 1949,Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N.: 1919,The Principles of Natural Knowledge, Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, E.W. Classical physical abstraction. Erkenntnis 38, 145–167 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128977

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128977

Keywords

Navigation