Skip to main content
Log in

A theoretical framework for comparisons of social movement participation

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

This article attempts to draft a framework for the comparison of movement participation. The standards of comparison I developed at the movement level were the magnitude of mobilization potentials, the composition of multiorganizational fields, organizational characteristics, and action orientation. Utilizing this framework, I compared mobilization campaigns for three different types of activities conducted by three different movements: a campaign conducted by a labor union for, possibly, a strike, a campaign of the Dutch peace movement in a local community for a national demonstration, and campaigns by women's groups in a community for a variety of activities. I explain differences in motivational dynamics and levels of participation in terms of differing movement characteristics. Finally, I discuss the advantages of comparative work on social movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, Samuel H. andMax Kaase 1979 Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Karl-Werner, (Hg. 1985 Neue soziale Bewegungen in West Europa und den USA. Ein internationaler Vergleich. New York/Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Karl-Werner, Dieter Büsser, andDieter Rucht 1983 Aufbruch in eine andere Gesellschaft, neue soziale Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik. Frankfurt/New York: Campusverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briët, Martien, Bert Klandermans, andFrederike Kroon 1987 “How women become involved in the women's movement.” In Mary Katzenstein and Carol Mueller (eds.), The Women's Movements in the U.S. and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity and Public Policy: 44–64. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin andAlessandro Pizzorno eds. 1978 The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe since 1968. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, Russell L. andLouis A. Zurcher 1973 “Stable resources of protest movements: The multi-organizational field.” Social Forces 52:53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everts, Philip, P. 1983 “Public Opinion, The Churches and Foreign Policy, Studies of Domestic Factors in the Making of Dutch Foreign Policy.” Unpublished dissertation, University of Leiden.

  • Feierabend, I. K. andR. L. Feierabend 1966 “Aggressive behaviors within politics, 1948–1962: A cross-national study.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 10:249–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. D. andI. Mattson 1978 Multivariate Analysis in Educational Research. Chicago: International Education Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. 1975 The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A., Bruce Fireman, and Steve Rytina 1982 Encounters with Unjust Authorities. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, Luther P. andVirginia G. Hine 1970 People, Power, Change: Movements of Social Transformation. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Ted Robert 1970 Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Douglas A. 1976 “Industrial conflict in advanced industrial societies.” American Political Science Review 70:1033–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltefleiter, W. andPfalzgraff, R. L. 1984 The Peace Movement in Europe and the United States. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod andCarol Mueller, (eds. 1987 The Womens' Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity and Public Policy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert 1986 “Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science 16:57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 “Mobilization and participation: Social psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory.” American Sociological Review 49:583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1991 “The peace movement and social movement theory.” In Bert Klandermans (ed.), Peace Movement in International Perspective, International Social Movement Research, Vol. 3:1–42. Greenwich, CT: JAI-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, Bert, (ed. 1989 “Organizing for change: Social movement organizations in Europe and the United States.” In International Social Movement Research, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, Bert andDirk Oegema 1987 “Potentials, networks, motivations and barriers: Steps toward participation in social movements.” American Sociological Review 5:519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter 1989 “The political opportunity structure of the Dutch peace movement.” West European Politics 12:296–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Ronald 1983 “A decentralized but moving pyramid: The evolution and consequences of the structure of the tenant movement.” In Jo Freeman (ed.), Movements in the Sixties and the Seventies: 119–132. New York/London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug 1982 Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, andMayer N. Zald 1988 “Social movements.” In Neil J. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology: 695–739. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John andMayer Zald 1976 “Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82:1212–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Aldon 1984 The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E. N. 1980 “The psychology of political protest and violence. In T. R. Gurr (ed.), Handbook of Political Conflict Theory and Research: 69–100. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, Dorothy andMichael Pollak 1981 The Atom Besieged. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, Anthony 1973 Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oegema, Dirk 1991 “The Dutch peace movement, 1977 to 1987.” In Bert Klandermans (ed.), Peace Movements in Western Europe and The United States, International Social Movement Research, Vol. 3:93–149. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur 1968 The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochon, Thomas R. 1988 Mobilizing for Peace. The Antinuclear Movements in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Jr., Steve K. Worden, andRobert D. Benford 1986 “Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation.” American Sociological Review 51:464–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staggenborg, Suzanne 1991 The Pro-Choice Movement: Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Ralph H. 1969 “The theme of contemporary social movements.” The British Journal of Sociology 20:390–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Ralph H. andLewis M. Killian 1987 Collective Behavior, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Loo, Hans, Erik Snel, andBart van Steenbergen 1984 Een Wenkend Perspectief? Nieuwe Sociale Bewegingen en Culturele Veranderingen. Amersfoort: De Horstink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Hajo 1989 “Conflict in interorganizational systems: On the logic of conflict of trade unions and employers' associations in the 1984 metal strike in West Germany.” In Bert Klandermans (ed.), International Social Movement Research, Vol. 2:363–382. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klandermans, B. A theoretical framework for comparisons of social movement participation. Sociol Forum 8, 383–402 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115051

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115051

Key words

Navigation