Abstract
The Merton thesis identifies two movements — English Puritanism and German Pietism — as causally significant in the development of the scientific revolution of the 17th and 18th centuries. It attributes this connection to a strong compatibility between the values of ascetic Protestantism and those associated with modern science. This article questions Merton's conclusion regarding one of these movements, German Pietism, by arguing that the Pietist ethos stood in sharp conflict with what Merton has called the normative structure of science. One manifestation of this conflict involves Friedrich Oetinger's articulation of a contending “religious-mystical” conception of science, which assigned a central place to feeling, intuition, the role of the divine, and a qualitative approach to nature. This conception of science, it is argued, provides the clearest indication of the conceptual and valuative distance that tended to separate Pietists from the “new science” of the 17th and 18th centuries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
1984 “Pietism and science: A critique of Robert K. Merton's hypothesis.” American Journal of Sociology 89: 1065–1090.
1986 “The fallacy of the received word: A reexamination of Merton's Pietism-science thesis.” American Journal of Sociology 91:1203–1218.
1991 “Pietism's confrontation with Enlightenment rationalism: An examination of the relation between ascetic Protestantism and science.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 30:139–158.
Benz, Ernst 1971 Theologie der Elektrizität: Zur Begegnung und Auseinandersetzung von Theologie und Naturwissenschaft im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Mainz: Franz Steiner.
Beyreuther, Erich 1977 “Die All-Lebendigkeit der Schöpfungswelt.” In Karl C. Ehmann and Erich Beyreuther (eds.), Swedenborgs irdische und himmlische Philosophie: xxii-xxix. Stuttgart: J. F. Steinkopf.
Buddeus, Johann F. 1980 Bedenken über die Wolffianische Philosophie. (1724*) In Christian Wolff, Kleine Kontroversschriften Mit Joachim Lange und Johann Franz Budde. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
Carroll, James W. 1954 “Merton's thesis on English science.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 13(4):427–432.
Cohen, I. Bernard, ed. 1990 Puritanism and the Rise of Modern Science: The Merton Thesis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Dillenberger, John 1960 Protestant Thought and Natural Science. New York: Doubleday.
Feldhay, Rivka, and Yehuda Elkana, eds. 1989 “‘After Merton’: Protestant and Catholic science in seventeenth-century Europe.” Science in Context 3:No. 1.
Feuer, Lewis S. 1963 The Scientific Intellectual. New York: Basic.
Francke, August H. 1969 “Kurzer und einfältiger Unterricht, wie die Kinder zur wahren Gottseligkeit und christlichen Klugheit anzuführen sind.” (1702*) In Erhard Peschke (ed.), August Hermann Francke: Werke in Auswahl: 124–150. Halle: Luther-Verlag.
Gay, Peter 1977 The Enlightenment: An Interpretation/The Rise of Modern Paganism. New York: W. W. Norton.
Goethe, Johann W. von 1983 “Theory of color.” (1810*) In Scientific Studies, Douglas Miller (ed. & transl.): 157–298. New York: Suhrkamp.
Greaves, Richard L. 1969 ‘Puritanism and science: The anatomy of a controversy’. Journal of the History of Ideas 30:345–368.
Grossmann, Sigrid 1979 Friedrich Christoph Oetingers Gottesvorstellung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Hahn, Hans-Cristoph, andHelmut Reichel 1977 Zinzendorf und die Herrnhuter Brüder. Hamburg: Wittig.
Hall, A. Rupert 1963 “Merton revisited, or science and society in the seventeenth century.” History of Science 2:1–16.
Harris, Steven J. 1989 “Transposing the Merton thesis: Apostolic spirituality and the establishment of the Jesuit scientific tradition. In Rivka Feldhay and Yehuda Elkana (eds.), Science in Context, Vol. 3, No. 1:29–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hauck, Wilhelm-Albert 1947 Das Geheimnis des Lebens: Naturanschauung und Gottesauffassung. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Heinze, Reiner 1969 Bengel und Oetinger als Vorläufer des deutschen Idealismus. Ph.D. dissertation: Münster University.
Lange, Joachim 1980 Anmerkungen Über Christian Wolffens Metaphysicam. (1724*) In Christian Wolff, Kleine Kontroverss-chriften Mit Joachim Lange und Johann Franz Budde. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
McNeill, John T. 1968 Modern Christian Movements. New York: Harper & Row.
1968a “Puritanism, Pietism and science.” (1936*) In Social Theory and Social Structure: 628–660. New York: Free Press.
1968b “Science and democratic social structure.” (1942*) In Social Theory and Social Structure: 604–615. New York: Free Press.
1970 Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England. (1938*) New York: Fertig.
1984 “The fallacy of the latest word: The case of ‘Pietism and science’.” American Journal of Sociology 89:1091–1121.
Mulligan, Lotte 1973 “Civil war politics, religion and the Royal Society.” Past and Present 59:92–116.
Nelson, C. Clifford 1979 Encyclopaedia Britannica. s.v. “pietism.”
Oetinger, Friedrich C. 1762 Die Philosophie der Alten. Frankfurt and Leipzig.
1765 Procopii Divisch Theorie von der meteorologischen Electricite. Tübingen: Joh. Heinr. Phil. Schramm.
1771 Die Metaphysic in Connexion mit der Chemie. Publ. under Halophilo Inrenäo Oetinger. Schw. Hall: Johann Christoph Messerer.
1849 Biblisches Wörterbuch. Julius Hamberger (ed.). Stuttgart: J. F. Steinkopf.
1852 Die Theologie aus der Idee des Lebens. Julius Hamberger (ed. & transl.). Stuttgart: J.F. Steinkopf.
1859 Friedrich Christoph Oetingers Leben und Briefe. Karl C. Ehmann (ed.). Stuttgart: J. F. Steinkopf.
1861 Die Wahrheit des Sensus communis. (1753*.) Karl C. Ehmann (ed.). Stuttgart: J. F. Steinkopf.
1979 Das Geheimnis vom Salz. (1770*) Publ. under Elias Artista Hermetica. Freiburg: Aurum.
Patel, Pravin J. 1975 “Robert Merton's formulations in sociology of science.” Sociological Bulletin 24:55–75.
Pinson, Koppel S. 1934 Pietism as a Factor in the Rise of German Nationalism. New York: Columbia University.
Ritzer, George 1983 Sociological Theory. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Schmidt, Martin 1972 Pietismus. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Shapiro, Barbara J. 1983 Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England. Princeton University Press.
Spener, Philip J. 1964 Pia Desideria. (1675*) Theodore G. Tappert (ed.). Philadelphia: Fortress.
Spindler, Guntram 1982 “Einführung.” In Richard Haug and Guntram Spindler (eds.), Etwas Ganzes vom Evangelium: v-xxxi. Metzingen: Ernst Franz.
Stoeffler, F. Ernest 1973 German Pietism During the Eighteenth Century. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Tholuck, D. A. 1865 Geschichte des Rationalismus. Berlin: Wiegandt & Grieben.
Wallace, Ruth A., andAlison Wolf 1986 Contemporary Sociological Theory: Continuing the Classical Tradition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Weber, Max 1958 The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. (1904–1905**) New York: Scribner's.
Webster, Charles 1975 The Great Instauration — Science, Medicine and Reform, 1626–1660. New York: Holmes & Meier.
Wehr, Gerhard 1978 Friedrich Christoph Oetinger: Theosoph, Alchymist, Kabbalist. Freiburg: Aurum.
Weyer-Menkhoff, Martin 1990 Christus, Das Heil Der Natur. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Becker, G. The merton thesis: Oetinger and German Pietism, a significant negative case. Sociol Forum 7, 641–660 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112319
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112319