Skip to main content
Log in

Divergent selection on locomotor activity inDrosophila melanogaster. II. Test for reproductive isolation between selected lines

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tests for reproductive isolation between lines selected for locomotor activity were performed. Three sets of selection lines were used, each consisting of lines selected for low and high locomotor activity from the same base population. Females preferred high-activity males in almost every case. However, in one of the sets temporary sexual isolation was found between flies of the high and low lines. This was accompanied in the low-activity females with a higher fertility when they were mated with their own males. After further selection the partial isolation disappeared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baptist, R., and Robertson, A. (1976). Asymmetrical responses to automatic selection for body size inDrosophila melanogaster.Theor. Appl. Genet.,47:209–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, B., and Connolly, K. (1975). Activity and sexual behaviour inDrosophila. InThe Genetics of Behaviour, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Solar, E. (1966). Sexual isolation caused by selection for and against positive and negative phototaxis and geotaxis inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 56:484–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardeland, R., and Stange, G., (1971). Einflüsse von Geslecht und Alter auf die lokomotorische Aktivität vonDrosophila.

  • Koref-Santibañez, S., and Waddington, C. H. (1958). The origin of sexual isolation between different lines within a species.Evolution 12:485–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latter, B. D. H., and Robertson, A. (1962): The effects of inbreeding and artificial selection on reproductive fitness.Genet. Res. 3:110–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malogolowkin-Cohen, C., Simmons, S., and Levene, H. (1965). A study of sexual isolation between certain strains ofDrosophila paulistorum.Evolution 19:95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. (1961). The effects of artificial selection for mating speed inDrosophila melanogaster.Anim. Behav. 9:82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. (1939). Reversibility in evolution considered from the standpoints of genetics.Biol. Rev. 14:261–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W., and Reeve, E. C. R. (1955). Studies in quantitative inheritance. VII. Crosses between strains of different bodysize inD. melanogaster.Z. Indukt. Abst. Vererbungs lehre 86:439–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1969).Biometry, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijken, F. R., and Scharloo, W. (1979). Divergent selection on locomotor activity inDrosophila melanogaster. I. Selection response.Behav. Genet.,9:543–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijken, F. R., Stolwijk, H., and Scharloo, W. (1980). Locomotor activity inDrosophila. Neth. J. Zool. (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Dijken, F.R., Scharloo, W. Divergent selection on locomotor activity inDrosophila melanogaster. II. Test for reproductive isolation between selected lines. Behav Genet 9, 555–561 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067351

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067351

Key Words

Navigation