Abstract
There has recently been much interest in the measurement of imprisonment rates. Since this variable has such widespread importance in criminological research and policy, new methods are called for in expanding the procedures for evaluating levels of punitiveness as indicated by imprisonment rates. This paper presents a new model using logarithmic transformations to develop a system for ranking the punitiveness of the states. Comparisons are made between different approaches to specifying imprisonment rates including controls for crime rates and arrest rates. Results of the analyses indicate that the use of this model generates somewhat different rankings of punitiveness compared with those based on sample imprisonment rates or prisoner/arrest ratios.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, T. W. (1984).An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Austin, J., and Tillman, R. (1988).Ranking the Nation's Most Punitive States, National Council on Crime and Delinquency, San Francisco.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (1988).Prisoners in 1987, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
Duffee, D. E. (1989).Corrections: Policy and Practice, Random House, New York.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (1988).Crime in the United States, 1987, U.S. Government Printing Press, Washington, DC.
Gaes, G. G., and McGuire, W. (1985). Prison violence: The contribution of crowding versus other determinants of prison assault rates.J. Res. Crime Deling. 22: 41–65.
Garofalo, J. (1987).Measuring the Use of Imprisonment, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
Gottfredson, S. D., and Taylor, R. B. (1984). Public policy and prison populations: Measuring opinions about reform.Judicature 68: 190–201.
Lehmann, E. L. (1983).Theory of Point Estimation, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Lehmann, E. L. (1986).Testing Statistical Hypotheses, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
McGarrell, E. F., and Castellano, T. C. (1991). An integrative conflict model of the criminal law formation process.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 28: 174–196.
Michalowski, R. J., and Pearson, M. A. (1990). Punishment and social structure at the state level: A cross-sectional comparison of 1970 and 1980.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 27: 52–78.
Riley, P. J., and Rose, V. M. (1980). Public and elite opinion concerning correctional reform.J. Crim. Just. 8: 345–356.
Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Zimmerman, S. E., Van Alystyne, D. J., and Dunn, C. S. (1988). The National Punishment Survey and public policy consequences.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 25: 120–149.
Zimring, F. E., and Hawkins, G. (1991).The Scale of Imprisonment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Selke, W.L., Andersson, S.A. A model for ranking the punitiveness of the states. J Quant Criminol 8, 217–232 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066745
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066745