Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical modeling of the effects of ‘capability’ and ‘intent’ on the stability of a competitive international system

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In international relations theory, there is a long history of Richardson-like modeling of the evolution of military capability. Usually, such models are deterministic and predictive and do not allow for the representation of the transition from competitive peace to shooting war. More recently, models have been developed which attempt to represent the evolution of ‘relationship’ between nations. The ‘relationship’ between nations, varying from friendship to hostility, is taken to be synonymous with the ‘intent’ of nations towards each other, varying from good will to malice. Generally, these relationship models do not include ‘capability’ though common sense would indicate that capability and mutual intent should profoundly influence each other. A model is presented here which combines these two fundamental attributes of international relations and attempts to represent the outbreak of war in the world system by the onset of deterministic chaos in the extended model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, Robert and Scott Bennett: 1991, ‘A Landscape Theory of Aggregation’, University of Michigan preprint, previous version presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.

  • Eckman, J. P.: 1981, ‘Roads to Turbulence in Dissipative Dynamical Systems’,Reviews of Modern Physics 53, 643–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Paul: 1987,The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. C., D. A. Zinnes, and R. G. Muncaster: 1991, ‘The Dynamics of International System Structure’, University of Illinois preprint.

  • Meadows, D., D. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. Behrens: 1972,The Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, Edward: 1981, ‘Strange Attractors and Chaotic Motions of Dynamical Systems’,Reviews of Modern Physics 53, 655–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Fred: 1992. Personal communication.

  • Richardson, L. F.: 1960a,Arms and Insecurity. Boxwood Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. F.: 1960b,Statistics of Deadly Quarrels. Boxwood Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, Thomas L.: 1968,Mathematical Models of Arms Control and Disarmament, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saperstein, A. M.: 1984, ‘Chaos — A Model for the Outbreak of War’,Nature 309, 303–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saperstein, A. M.: 1986, ‘Predictability, Chaos, and the Transition to War’,Bulletin of Peace Proposals 17, 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saperstein, A. M.: 1990, ‘Chaos and the Making of International Security Policy’, In Saul Krasner (ed.),The Ubiquity of Chaos. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington D.C., pp. 167–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saperstein, A. M.: 1991, ‘The Long Peace — Result of a Bi-Polar Competitive World?’,Journal of Conflict Resolution,35(1), 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saperstein, A. M.: 1992, ‘The Use of Physical Concepts, Like “Chaos” and “Phase Transitions”, for Analysis of Social Problems, Like the Transition from Peace to War’. Paper presented at Fourth World Peace Science Conference, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

  • Saperstein, A. M.: 1992a, ‘Are Democracies More or Less Prone To War? A Dynamical Model Approach’,Mathematical and Computer Modeling 16(8/9), 213–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saperstein, A. M.: 1992b, ‘Alliance Building vs. Independent Action: A Non-Linear Modeling Approach to Comparative International Stability’,Journal of Conflict Resolution,36(3), 518–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrodt, Philip A.: 1981,Preserving Arms Distributions in a Multi-Polar World, University of Denver Monograph Series in World Affairs, volume 18, book 4.

  • Schuster, Heinz Georg.: 1988,Deterministic Chaos — An Introduction, Second Revised Edition, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim, FRG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, Barbara: 1962,The Guns of August, Dell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Clausiwitz, Karl: 1832,On War (English Translation), 1968, A. Rapoport (ed.), Penguin New York.

  • Waltz, Kenneth N.: 1979,Theory of International Politics, Addison-Wesley, Reading. Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, Stephen M.: 1987,The Origins of Alliances. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinnes, D.A.: 1992. Personal Communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

On leave 1994–95 at U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Washington, D.C. 20451, U.S.A.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saperstein, A.M. Mathematical modeling of the effects of ‘capability’ and ‘intent’ on the stability of a competitive international system. Synthese 100, 359–378 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063908

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063908

Keywords

Navigation