Abstract
In 1792 and 1798 Kant noticed two basic problems with hisMetaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (MAdN) which opened a crucial gap in the Critical system as a whole. Why is theMAdN so important? I show that the Analogies of Experience form an integrated proof of transeunt causality. This is central to Kant's ‘answer’ to Hume. This proof requires explicating the empirical concept of matter as “the moveable in space”, it requires the specifically metaphysical principle that every physical event has an external cause, and it requires a metaphysical principle regarding the individuation of spatio-temporal things. These three doctrines are not defended in the firstCritique, but only in theMAdN. Kant's transcendental analysis of the conditions of experience thus requires the “special metaphysics” of theMAdN. This marks an important shift in Kant's view of the metaphysical basis of the transcendental philosophy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adickes, Erich: 1924,Kant als Naturforscher, 2 vols., de Gruyter, Berlin.
Ameriks, Karl: 1992, ‘The Critique of Metaphysics: Kant and Traditional Ontology’, in P. Guyer (ed.),The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 249–79.
Beck, Lewis White: 1978, ‘A Prussian Hume and a Scottish Kant’, inEssays on Kant and Hume, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 111–29.
Brittan, Gordon: 1986, ‘Kant's Two Grand Hypotheses’, in R. Butts (ed.),Kant's Philosophy of Physical Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 61–94.
Buchdahl, Gerd: 1969,Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science Blackwell, London.
Buchdahl, Gerd: 1992,Kant and the Dynamics of Reason, Blackwell, London.
Carrier, Martin: 1990, ‘Kants Theorie der Materie und ihre Wirkung auf die zeitgenossische Chemie’,Kant-Studien 81, 170–210.
Carrier, Martin: 1991, ‘Kraft und Wirklichkeit. Kants späte Theorie der Materie’, in Forum für Philosophie Bad Homburg (ed.),Übergang: Untersuchungen zum Spätwerk Immanuel Kants, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 208–30.
Cramer, Konrad: 1985,Nicht-reine synthetische Urteile a priori. Ein Problem der Transzendentalphilosophie Immanuel Kants, C. Winter, Heidelberg.
Dahlstrom, Daniel: 1991, ‘Kant's Metaphysics of Nature’, in: D. Dahlstrom (ed.),Nature and Scientific Method Catholic University of America Press, Washington, pp. 271–90.
Descartes, René: 1964-, C. Adam and P. Tannery (eds.),Oevres de Descartes, 13 vols., revised edition, Vrin/C.N.R.S., Paris.
Descartes, René: 1984-, J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch (trs.),The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 3 vols., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Doney, Willis: 1967, ‘Cartesianism’, in P. Edwards (Ed.-in-Chief),The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 3, Macmillan, New York, pp. 37–42.
Duncan, Howard: 1986, ‘Kant's Methodology: Progress Beyond Newton?’, inKant's Philosophy of Physical Science (op. cit.), pp. 273–306.
Edwards, B. Jeffrey: 1991, ‘Der Ätherbeweis des Opus Postumum und Kants 3. Analogie der Erfahrung’, inÜbergang (op. cit.), pp. 77–104.
Edwards, B. Jeffrey: 1987,Dynamical Community and Dynamical “World Matter” in Kant's Account of Material Substance, Dissertation, Philips-Universität, Marburg.
Förster, Eckart: 1987, ‘Is There “A Gap” in Kant's Critical System?’,Journal of the History of Philosophy 25(4), 536–55.
Förster, Eckart: 1989, ‘Kant's Notion of Philosophy’,The Monist 72(2), 285–304.
Friedman, Michael: 1992,Kant and the Exact Sciences, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Garber, Daniel: 1992,Descartes' Metaphysical Physics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Gloy, Karen: 1984, ‘Das Verhältnis der Kritik der reinen Vernunft zu den Metaphysischen Anfangsgründen der Naturwissenschaft, demonstriert am Substanzsatz’,Philosophia Naturalis 21, 32–63.
Guyer, Paul: 1987,Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Guyer, Paul: 1992, ‘The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories’, inThe Cambridge Companion to Kant (op. cit.), pp. 123–60.
Hall, Rupert and Marie B. Hall: 1960, ‘Newton's Theory of Matter’,Isis 51, 131–44.
Hume, David: 1975,An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, in P. H. Nidditch (ed.),Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
Hume, David: 1978, L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch (eds.),A Treatise of Human Nature, Clarendon, Oxford.
Kant, Immanuel: 1902-,Kants Gesammelte Schriften, 29 vols., Königlich Preußische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften, G. Reimer (now De Gruyter), Berlin; usually referred to as ‘Akademie-Ausgabe’.
Kant, Immanuel: 1929, Kemp Smith (tr.),Kant's Critique of Pure Reason St. Martin's, New York.
Kant, Immanuel: 1967, A. Zweig (tr.),Philosophical Correspondence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kant, Immanuel: 1985, J. Ellington (tr.),Philosophy of Material Nature Hackett, Indianapolis.
Kant, Immanuel: 1987, W. Pluhar (tr.),Critique of Judgment, Hackett, Indianapolis.
Kant, Immanuel: 1993, E. Förster, (ed. and tr.) and M. Rosen (tr.),Opus postumun, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Koyré, Alexandre: 1965, ‘Newton and Descartes’, inNewtonian Studies Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 53–200.
Laywine, Allison: 1993,Kant's Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy Ridgeview, Atascadero, CA.
Mandelbaum, Maurice: 1964,Philosophy, Science, and Sense Perception Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Melnick, Arthur: 1989,Space, Time and Thought in Kant Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Newton, Isaac: 1952,Opticks Dover, New York.
Newton, Isaac: 1962, A. R. Hall and M. B. Hall (eds. and trs.),Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Paton, H. J.: 1935,Kant's Metaphysic of Experience, 2 vols., George Allen & Unwin, London, New York, Humanities.
Plaass, Peter: 1965,Kants Theorie der Naturwissenschaft: Eine Untersuchung zur Vorrede von Kants ‘Metaphysischen Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft’ Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
Smith, Norman Kemp: 1930,A Commentary to Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ 2nd ed. Macmillan, London.
Tuschling, Burkhard: 1971,Metaphysische und transzendentale Dynamik in Kants opus postumum, de Gruyter, Berlin.
Van Cleve, James: 1988, ‘Inner States and Outer Relations: Kant and the Case for Monadism’, in P. Hare (ed.),Doing Philosophy Historically Prometheus, Buffalo, pp. 231–47.
Waschkies, Hans-Joachim: 1991, ‘Wissenschaftliche Praxis und Erkenntnistheorie in Kants Opus postumum’, inÜbergang (op. cit.), pp. 185–207.
Washburn, Michael: 1975, ‘The Second Edition of the Critique: Toward an Understanding of its Nature and Genesis’,Kant-Studien 66, 277–90.
Westphal, Kenneth R.: 1995a, ‘Kant's Dynamic Constructions’,Journal of Philosophical Research 20: 381–429.
Westphal, Kenneth R.: 1995b, ‘Kant's Critique of Determinism in Empirical Psychology’, in H. Robinson (ed.),Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress, 2 vols., Marquette University Press, Milwaukee, WI, II.1, pp. 356–70.
Westphal, Kenneth R.: forthcoming, ‘Noumental Causality Reconsidered’.
Williams, L. Pearce: 1965,Michael Faraday Basic, New York.
Wolff, Robert Paul: 1963,Kant's Theory of Mental Activity Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Westphal, K.R. Does Kant'sMetaphysical Foundations of Natural Science fill a gap in theCritique of Pure Reason?. Synthese 103, 43–86 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063718
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063718