Skip to main content
Log in

Computing the Fourier transform of real data on a hypercube

  • Published:
Journal of Scientific Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are two ways, other than the standard fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm, of computing Fourier transforms of real data, namely, (1)the real fast Fourier transform (RFFT) algorithm, and (2) the fast Hartley transform (FHT) algorithm. On a sequential computer, it has been shown that both the RFFT and the FHT algorithms are faster than the FFT algorithm. However, it is not obvious that the same is true on a parallel machine. The communication requirements of the RFFT and the FHT algorithms, which are critical to the cost of any parallel implementation, are different from those of the FFT algorithm. In this paper we present efficient implementations of the RFFT and the FHT algorithms on a hypercube machine. Experimental results are given for the implementation of the RFFT and the FHT algorithms on the NCUBE machine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, D. H. (1987). A high-performance fast Fourier transform algorithm for the CRAY-2,J. Supercomput. 1, 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracewell, R. N. (1986).The Hartley Transform, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergland, G. D. (1968). A fast Fourier transform algorithm for real-valued series,Commun. ACM 11(10), 703–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buneman, O. (1986). Conversion of FFT's to fast Hartley transforms,SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput.7(2), 624–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, R. M. (1988). Gray codes, fast Fourier transforms and hypercubes,Parallel Comput. 6, 225–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabiner, L. R., and Gold, B. (1975).Theory and Application of Digital Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockney, R. W., and Jesshope, C. R. (1981).Parallel Computers, Adam Hilger.

  • Jamieson, L. H., Mueller, P. T., and Siegel, H. J. (1986). FFT algorithm for SIMD parallel processing systems,J. Parallel Distributed Comput. 3, 48–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamin, R. A., III, and Adams, G.B., III (1988). Fast Fourier transform algorithm design and tradeoffs on the CM-2, in Proceedings of the Conference on Scientific Applications of the Connection Machine, September 1988, pp. 134–160.

  • Sorensen, H. V., Jones, D. G., Heideman, M. T., and Burrus, C. S. (1987). Real-valued fast Fourier transform algorithms,IEEE Trans. ASSP ASSP-35(6), 849–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartztrauber, P. N. (1986). Symmetric FFTs,Math. Comput. 47(175), 323–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarztrauber, P. N. (1987). Multiprocessor FFTs,Parallel Comput. 5, 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dubey, A., Zubair, M. & Grosch, C.E. Computing the Fourier transform of real data on a hypercube. J Sci Comput 5, 293–309 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063119

Key words

Navigation