Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of P- availability from monocalcium and diammonium phosphates using a mechanistic nutrient uptake model

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calcium and ammonium phosphates are the most commonly used phosphate fertilizers. Since they differ in some chemical aspects it is important to compare their ability for supplying P to plant roots in different soils. The objective of this research was to compare the predicted effectiveness of monocalcium phosphate (MCP) and diammonium phosphate (DAP) for supply of P to maize in 13 soils. Phosphorus was applied at rates varying with soil from 50 to 400 mg kg−1. Thirty days later P, Ca, pH, and Al were measured in the soil solution and in the solid phase. We calculated buffer power (b) and effective diffusion coefficient (De) for P, and used them, together with solution P (Cli), in the Barber-Cushman mechanistic nutrient model to predict P uptake. Monocalcium phosphate and DAP were similarly effective in supplying P to plant roots. Predicted P uptake differed between fertilizers in only three soils, and maximum differences between fertilizers in Cli or resin-exchangeable P (Csi) in any one soil were always less than 30%. The determinations most highly correlated with predicted P uptake were De (r = 0.93**) and Cli (r = 0.60*). Resin-exchangeable P was not significantly correlated with Cli, De, b or P uptake. Calcium, Al, and pH varied with source of P and soil: soils treated with DAP had lower extractable Al, lower Al in solution, and higher soil pH than soils where MCP was applied. Monocalcium phosphate increased extractable Ca whereas DAP did not affect it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams F (1982) A comparison of the effects of monocalcium phosphate and diammonium phosphate on phosphorus and calcium availabilities. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46: 769–771

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amer F, Shams MS, Awad KM and Khalil MA (1980) Immobilization of diammonium phosphate and monocalcium phosphate in calcareous soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44: 1174–1178

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amer F, Khalil MA and Diab GS (1982) Agronomic effectiveness of pyrophosphate as an additive to monocalcium phosphate in calcareous soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46: 579–583

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barber SA (1984) Soil nutrient bioavailability: A mechanistic approach. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barber SA and Cushman J (1981) Nitrogen uptake model for agronomic crops. p. 382–409. In: Iskandar IK (ed.) Modeling wastewater renovation-land treatment. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barraclough PB and Tinker PB (1981) The determination of ionic diffusion coefficients in field soils: I. Diffusion coefficients in sieved soils in relation to water content and bulk density. J Soil Sci 32: 225–236

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett AC and Adams F (1970) Calcium deficiency and ammonia toxicity as a separate causal effects of (NH4)2HPO4-injury to seedlings. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34: 255–259

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bouldin DR and Sample EC (1959) Laboratory and greenhouse studies with monocalcium, monoammonium, and diammonium phosphates. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23: 338–342

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ernani PR and Barber SA (1990) Increase of phosphorus availability in a highly weathered soil with low pH as affected by different salts. Soil Sci Soc Am J (submitted)

  10. Kovar JL and Barber SA (1988) Phosphorus supply characteristics of 33 soils as influenced by seven rates of phosphorus addition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52: 160–165

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lindsay WL, Lehr JR and Stephenson HF (1959) Nature of the reactions of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate in soils. III. Studies with metastable triple-point solution. Soil Sci Sci Am Proc 23: 342–346

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mackay AD and Barber SA (1984) Soil temperature effects on root growth and phosphorus uptake by corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48: 818–823

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mackay AD, Kladivko EJ, Barber SA and Griffith DR (1987) Phosphorus and potassium uptake by corn in conservation tillage systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51: 970–974

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mosquera A and Mombiela F (1986) Comparison of three methods for the determination of aluminum in an unbuffered salt extract. Commun in Soil Sci Plant Anal 17: 97–113

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy J and Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chem Acta 27: 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nye PB and Tinker PB (1977) Solute movement in the soil-root system. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  17. SAS Institute Inc. (1985) SAS User's guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 956 pp

    Google Scholar 

  18. Silberbush M and Barber SA (1983) Prediction of phosphorus and potassium uptake by soybeans with a mechanistic mathematical model. Soi Sci Soc Am J 47: 262–265

    Google Scholar 

  19. Silberbush M and Barber SA (1984) Phosphorus and potassium uptake of field-grown soybean cultivars predicted by a simulation model. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48: 592–596

    Google Scholar 

  20. Siqueira OJF, Scherer EE, Tassinary G, Anghinoni I, Patella JF, Tedesco MJ, Milan PA and Ernani PR (1987) Recomendacao de adubacao e calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. Passo Fundo (RS), Brasil, EMBRAPA-CNPT. 100 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution of Purdue Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Purdue Journal Paper No. 12094. Received 0000.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ernani, P.R., Barber, S.A. Comparison of P- availability from monocalcium and diammonium phosphates using a mechanistic nutrient uptake model. Fertilizer Research 22, 15–20 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054802

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054802

Key words

Navigation