Skip to main content
Log in

Presentation functions, fixed points, and a theory of scaling function dynamics

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Presentation functions provide the time-ordered points of the forward dynamics of a system as successive inverse images. They generally determine objects constructed on trees, regular or otherwise, and immediately determine a functional form of the transfer matrix of these systems. Presentation functions for regular binary trees determine the associated forward dynamics to be that of a period doubling fixed point. They are generally parametrized by the trajectory scaling function of the dynamics in a natural way. The requirement that the forward dynamics be smooth with a critical point determines a complete set of equations whose solution is the scaling function. These equations are compatible with a dynamics in the space of scalings which is conjectured, with numerical and intuitive support, to possess its solution as a unique, globally attracting fixed point. It is argued that such dynamics is to be sought as a program for the solution of chaotic dynamics. In the course of the exposition new information pertaining to universal mode locking is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. J. Feigenbaum, Universality in Complex Discrete Dynamics, LA-6816-PR: Theoretical Division Annual Report, July 1975–September 1976, Los Alamos;J. Stat. Phys. 19:25 (1978);21:669 (1979).

  2. D. Ruelle,Statistical Mechanics, Thermodynamic Formalism (Addison-Wesley, 1978).

  3. E. B. Vul, Ya. G. Sinai, and K. M. Khanin,Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 39:3 (1984) [Russ. Math. Surv. 39:1 (1984)].

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. J. Feigenbaum,J. Stat. Phys. 46:919, 925 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. C. Halsey, M. H. Jensen, L. P. Kadanoff, I. Procaccia, and P. I. Schraiman,Phys. Rev. A 33:1141 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. J. Feigenbaum, inProceedings of the 1987 Noto Summer School.

  7. M. J. Feigenbaum, I. Procaccia, and T. Tel, The scaling properties of multifractals as an eigenvalue problem,Nonlinearity, submitted.

  8. M. J. Feigenbaum,Phys. Lett. 74A:375 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. J. Feigenbaum,Commun. Math. Phys. 77:65 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. J. Feigenbaum, inNonlinear Phenomena in Chemical Dynamics, C. Vidal and A. Pecault, eds. (Springer-Verlag, 1981).

  11. M. J. Feigenbaum, L. P. Kadanoff, and S. F. Shenker,Physica D 5:370 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Rand, S. Ostlund, J. Sethna, and E. Siggia,Physica D 5 (1982).

  13. M. J. Feigenbaum, inNonlinear Phenomena in Physics, E. Claro, ed. (Springer-Verlag, 1984).

  14. H. A. Gutowitz, J. D. Victor, and B. W. Knight,Physica 28D (1987).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feigenbaum, M.J. Presentation functions, fixed points, and a theory of scaling function dynamics. J Stat Phys 52, 527–569 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019716

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019716

Key words

Navigation