Abstract
Ostensibly, the approval of legalized casino type gambling in the Netherlands was intended to combat illegal and uncontrolled gambling. Very early on, however, the plan conceived and implemented by the Netherlands Parliament demonstrated serious mismarketing strategies and tactics. The new legal casinos were appealing to people other than those engaged in illegal gambling, in particular foreign tourists and local “high rollers.” This paper attempts to analyze the ultimate process of goal displacement, as the state casino industry allowed economic objectives to supplant desires to utilize legal casinos primarily as controls over illegal gambling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Keren, G. & Wagenaar, W.A. (1985). On the psychology of playing blackjack: Normative and descriptive considerations with implications for decision theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 113–158.
Klaver, F. (1986a).Kansspelen. Utrecht: A.W. Bruna.
Miers, D. (1981). The mismanagement of casinos.British Journal of Criminology, 21, 79–86.
Nationale Stichtung voor Exploitie van Casinospelen in Nederland (1977–1982).Annual Reports.
Polders. B. (1984). Dutch casinos make steady progress in European market,Public Gaming Magazine, 12 (1), 36–40.
Raad Voor De Casinospelen (1975). Articles 2 & 25–31. The Hague.
Raad Voor De Casinospelen (1981). Bijlage v, wet op de Kanspelen, The Hague.
Thompson, William N. (1988a). The Dutch gamble: A strategy for the expansion of legalized casino gambling in the Netherlands, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking; Eadington, W.R. (Ed.) (1988).Gambling Research: 1, 206–238. Reno: University of Nevada.
Thompson, W. N. (1988b). End of monopolies creates uncertainties in West Germany,Gaming and Wagering Business, 9, 1, 52–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, W.N., Pinney, J.K. The emergence of Dutch casinos: A case study of mismarketing?. J Gambling Stud 6, 205–221 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014579
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014579