Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic particle acceleration and statistical closures

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent paper, Maasjost and Elsässer (ME) concluded, from the results of numerical experiments and heuristic arguments, that the Bourret and the direct-interaction approximation (DIA) are “of no use in connection with the stochastic acceleration problem” because (1) their predictions were equivalent to that of the simpler Fokker-Planck (FP) theory, and (2) either all or none of the closures were in good agreement with the data. Here some analytically tractable cases are studied and used to test the accuracy of these closures. The cause of the discrepancy (2) is found to be the highly non-Gaussian nature of the force used by ME, a point not stressed by them. For the case where the force is a position-independent Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (i.e., Gaussian) process, an effective Kubo numberK can be defined. ForK≪1 an FP description is adequate, and conclusion (1) of ME follows; however, forK>1 the DIA behaves much better qualitatively than the other two closures. For the non-Gaussian stochastic force used by ME, all common approximations fail, in agreement with (2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. A. Sturrock,Phys. Rev. 114:186 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. E. Hall and P. A. Sturrock,Phys. Fluids 10:2620 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. A. Orszag and R. H. Kraichnan,Phys. Fluids 10:1720 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. A. Orszag, inProceedings of the Symposium on Turbulence of Fluids and Plasmas (Polytechnic Press, Brooklyn, New York), p. 17.

  5. W. B. Thompson and J. Hubbard,Rev. Mod. Phys. 32:714 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Hubbard,Proc. Roy. Soc. A 260:25 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Kubo,J. Math. Phys. 4:174 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. C. Bourret,Can. J. Phys. 40:782 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. G. van Kampen,Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, Chap. XIV (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981);Physica 74:215 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. B. Keller,Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. 16 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 164), p. 894.

  11. R. Kubo, inFluctuation, Relaxation, and Resonance in Magnetic Systems, D. ter Haar, ed. (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburg, 1962), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Maasjost and K. Elsässer,J. Stat. Phys. 28:783 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. H. Kraichnan,J. Math. Phys. 2:124 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. A. Krommes, inHandbook of Plasma Physics, vol. 2, A. A. Galeev and R. N. Sudan, eds. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984), p. 183 and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work supported partly by U.S. D.o.E. Contract No. DE-ACO2-76-CHO-3073 and partly by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF PHY82-17853, supplemented by funds from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimits, A.M., Krommes, J.A. Stochastic particle acceleration and statistical closures. J Stat Phys 44, 879–906 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011912

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011912

Key words

Navigation