Abstract
We study the fate of the Onsager-Casimir reciprocity relations for a continuous system when some of its variables are eliminated adiabatically. Just as for discrete systems, deviations appear in correction terms to the reduced evolution equation that are of higher order in the time scale ratio. The deviations are not removed by including correction terms to the coarse-grained thermodynamic potential. However, via a reformulation of the theory, in which the central role of the thermodynamic potential is taken over by an associated Lagrangian-type expression, we arrive at a modified form of the Onsager-Casimir relations that survives the adiabatic elimination procedure. There is a simple relation between the time evolution of the redefined thermodynamic forces and that of the basic thermodynamic variables; this relation also survives the adiabatic elimination. The formalism is illustrated by explicit calculations for the Klein-Kramers equation, which describes the phase space distribution of Brownian particles, and for the corrected Smoluchowski equation derived from it by adiabatic elimination of the velocity variable. The symmetry relation for the latter leads to a simple proof that the reality of the eigenvalues of the simple Smoluchowski equation is not destroyed by the addition of higher order corrections, at least not within the framework of a formal perturbation expansion in the time scale ratio.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Onsager,Phys. Rev. 37:405 (1931);38:2265 (1931).
H. B. G. Casimir,Rev. Mod. Phys. 17:343 (1945).
S. R. de Groot,Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1951).
S. R. de Groot and P. Mazur,Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962).
N. G. van Kampen,Phys. Rep. 124:69 (1985).
C. Cercignani,Theory and Application of the Boltzmann Equation (Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 1975); J. R. Dorfman and H. van Beijeren, inStatistical Mechanics, Part B: Time-Dependent Processes, B. J. Berne, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1977).
U. M. Titulaer,Physica 91A:321 (1978).
U. M. Titulaer, Physica110A:234 (1980), and references therein.
U. Geigenmüller, U. M. Titulaer, and B. U. Felderhof,Physica 119A:53 (1983).
B. U. Felderhof and U. M. Titulaer,Physica 100A:563 (1980).
U. M. Titulaer and B. U. Felderhof,Physica 100A:573 (1980).
J.-F. Gouyet,J. Stat. Phys. 45:267 (1986); see also J.-F. Gouyet and A. Bunde,J. Stat. Phys. 36:43 (1984).
I. Kuscer,Physica 133A:397 (1985).
N. G. van Kampen,Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).
N. G. van Kampen,J. Stat. Phys. 46:709 (1987); see also J. Keiser,J. Stat. Phys. 31:485 (1983);37:491 (1984); B.C. Eu,J. Stat. Phys. 37:485 (1984).
H. Haken,Synergetics-An Introduction, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1983).
N. G. van Kampen,J. Stat. Phys. 17:71 (1977).
H. Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation; Methods of Solution and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1984), Section 11.9; H. D. Vollmer and H. Risken,Physica 110A:106 (1982).
N. G. van Kampen and I. Oppenheim,Physica 138A:231 (1986).
U. M. Titulaer,J. Stat. Phys. 37:589 (1984), and references therein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hubmer, G.F., Titulaer, U.M. The Onsager-Casimir relations revisited. J Stat Phys 49, 331–346 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01009967
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01009967