Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo computer simulations of spinodal decomposition

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main results of recent computer simulations of spinodal decomposition in various systems are summarized and compared. Both Monte Carlo simulations of the kinetic Ising system and molecular dynamics simulations of phase separation in Lennard-Jones systems yield power law growth for the coarsening of the decomposition pattern and scaling of the spinodal peak of the structure factor. These similarities and also distinct differences of the dynamics of one-and two-component systems and of the different simulation techniques are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. S. Langer, M. Bar-On, and H. D. Miller,Phys. Rev. A 11:1417 (1975) and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. W. Cahn,Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 242:166 (1968) and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. I. Goldburg, inScattering Techniques Applied to Supramolecular and Nonequilibrium Systems, S. H. Chen, B. Chu, and R. Nossal, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1981), p. 383, and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See, e.g., the review article of K. Binder, inSystems Far from Equilibrium, L. Garrida, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1980), p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. D. Gunton, M. San Miguel, and P. S. Sahni, The dynamics of first order phase transitions, preprint, 1983.

  6. S. W. Koch, R. C. Desai, and F. F. Abraham,Phys. Lett. 89A:231 (1982);Phys. Rev. A 26:1015 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. L. Lebowitz, J. Marro, and M. H. Kalos,Acta Metallurgica 30:297 (1982) and the given references to the author's work partly in collaboration with other authors.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. F. Abraham, S. W. Koch, and R. C. Desai,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49:923 (1982); S. W. Koch, R. C. Desai, and F. F. Abraham,Phys. Rev. A 27:2152 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, e.g., J. Kushick and B. J. Berne, inStatistical Mechanics Part B, B. J. Berne (ed.) (Plenum Press, New York 1977); A. Rahman,Phys. Rev. 136:A405 (1964); L. Verlet,Phys. Rev. 159:98 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. F. Abraham,Phys. Rep. 53:95 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Binder (ed.),Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics (Springer, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Binder (ed.), inMonte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics (Springer, New York, 1979), p. 14; also, e.g., D. Levesqueet al., p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. J. Leamy, G. H. Gilmer, and K. A. Jackson,Phys. Rev. Lett. 30:601 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. M. Lifshitz and V. V. Slyozov,J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19:35 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koch, S.W., Liebmann, R. Comparison of molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo computer simulations of spinodal decomposition. J Stat Phys 33, 31–41 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01009746

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01009746

Key words

Navigation