Abstract
The lack of an adequate assessment tool for wife abuse has hindered empirical research. The Measure of Wife Abuse (MWA) was developed to improve on previously developed instruments, mainly by using empirical methods of construction, which has enabled the MWA to assess a broader range of wife abuse behaviors. The purpose of this study was to determine the factor structure of the MWA items, and to assess its reliability and validity. Confirmatory multiple group factor analyses of the MWA responses of 164 abused women yielded four factors: Physical, Sexual, Psychological, and Verbal Abuse. The MWA was found to possess adequate levels of both reliability, estimated from its internal consistency, and concurrent validity, with the Conflict Tactics Scales as the criterion measure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barling, J., O'Leary, K. D., Jouriles, E. N., Vivian, D., and MacEwen, K. E. (1987). Factor similarity of the CTS across samples, spouses, and sites.J. Fam. Viol. 2: 37–54.
Bardis, P. D. (1973). Violence: Theory and quantification.J. Polit. Milit. Sociol. 1: 121–146.
Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1979).Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy, Free Press, New York.
Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1981). Social science and social action.J. Fam. Issues 2: 439–470.
Flynn, J. P. (1977). Recent findings related to wife abuse.Social Casework 58: 13–20.
Frieze, I. H. (1983). Investigating the causes and consequences of marital rape.Signs J. Wom. Culture Soc. 8: 532–553.
Ganley, A. L. (1981).Court-Mandated Counseling for Men Who Batter: A Three-Day Workshop for Mental Health Professionals—Participanls' Manual, Center for Women's Policy Studies, Washington, DC.
Gaquin, D. A. (1977–1978). Spouse abuse: Data from the National Crime Survey.Victimol. Int. J. 2: 632–643.
Gelles, R. J. (1972).The Violent Home: A Study of Physical Aggression Between Husbands and Wives, Sage, Beverly Hills.
Gelles, R. J. (1980). Violence in the family: A review of research in the seventies.J. Marr. Fam. 42: 873–885.
Gelles, R. J. (1982). Applying research on family violence to clinical practice.J. Marr. Fam. 44: 9–20.
Gelles, R. J. (1987).Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Gondolf, E. W. (1987). Evaluating programs for men who batter: Problems and prospects. J.Fam. Viol. 2: 95–108.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983).Factor Analysis (second edition), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1988).UniMult: For Univariate and Multivariate Analysis, UniMult, Altadena, CA.
Hilberman, E., and Munson, K. (1977–1978). Sixty battered women.Victimol. Int. J. 2: 460–470.
Hoffman, P. (1984). Psychological abuse of women by spouses and live-in lovers.Wom. Ther. 3: 37–47.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1975).Four Factor Index of Social Status, Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, Department of Sociology, New Haven, CT.
Hornung, C. A., McCullough, B. C., and Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse.J Man. Fam. 43: 675–692.
Hudson, W. W., and McIntosh, S. R. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions.J. Marr. Fam. 43: 873–888.
Kuhl, A. F. (1982). Community responses to battered women.Victim. Int. J. 7: 49–59.
Lambert, L. K., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1988).Assessing Spousal Abuse: Beyond the Conflict Tactics Scales, Unpublished master's thesis, California State University, Fullerton, CA.
Levinger, G. (1966). Sources of marital dissatisfaction among applicants for divorce.Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 36: 803–807.
Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students.Fam. Relat. 30: 97–102.
Martin, D. (1981).Battered Wives (rev. ed.), Volcano Press, San Francisco.
Pagelow, M. D. (1981).Woman-battering: Victims and their experiences, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Rhodes, N. R. (1985). The assessment of spousal abuse: An alternative to the Conflict Tactics Scale. (Doctoral dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary, 1985).Diss. Abstr. Int. 46: 2076B.
Rounsaville, B. J. (1978). Theories in marital violence: Evidence from a study of battered women.Victimol. Int. J. 3: 11–31.
Russell, D. E. H. (1982).Rape in Marriage, MacMillan, New York.
Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband-abuse or self-defense?Viol. Vict. 1: 47–60.
Shields, N. M., and Hanneke, C. R. (1983). Battered wives' reactions to marital rape. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, and M. A. Straus (eds.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 131–148.
Snyder, D. K., and Fruchtman, L. A. (1981). Differential patterns of wife abuse: A data-based typology.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49: 878–885.
Stacey, W. A., and Shupe, A. S. (1983).The Family Secret: Domestic Violence in America, Beacon Press, Boston.
Straus, M. A. (1974). Leveling, civility, and violence in the family.J. Marr. Fam. 36: 13–29.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.J. Man. Fam.41: 75–88.
Straus, M. A. (1987).The Conflict Tactics Scales: An evaluation and new data on validity, reliability, norms, and scoring methods, Unpublished manuscript, University of New Hampshire, Family Research Laboratory, Durham, NH.
Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two marital surveys.J. Marr. Fam. 48: 465–479.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind Closed Doors, Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners.Viol. Vict. 4: 159–177.
Walker, L. E. A. (1979).The Battered Woman, Harper & Row, New York.
Walker, L. E. A. (1984).The Battered Woman Syndrome, Springer, New York.
Wolfgang, M. E. (1958).Patterns in Criminal Homicide, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodenburg, F.A., Fantuzzo, J.W. The measure of wife abuse: Steps toward the development of a comprehensive assessment technique. J Fam Viol 8, 203–228 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988769
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988769