Abstract
Incest has been documented in most civilizations and for as long as can be remembered. This article begins with a brief historical overview of incest across cultures and times. The second part includes a review of several theories that place the significance of the incest taboo in an historical continuum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Finkelhor, D. Psychological, cultural, and family factors in incest and family sexual abuse.Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling. 1978,4, 41–50.
Freud, S. Totem and TabooObras Completes. Buenos Aires: Santiago Rueda, 1953.
Gebhardt, P. Sex offenders: An analysis of types. New York: Harper and Row, 1965.
Henderson, D.J. Incest: A synthesis of data.Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 1972,17, 299–312.
Kinsey, A. Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: U.B. Saunders, 1953.
Levi-Strauss, C. The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon press, 1969.
Lindsey, G. Some remarks concerning incest, “The incest taboo and psychoanalytic theory”.American Psychologist, 1967,22, 1050–1059.
Malinowsky, B. Sex and repression in savage society. London: Routledge, Kogan, Paul, 1927.
Meisch, H. Incest. London: Andre Deutsch Limited Publishers, 1972.
Meiselman, K. Incest. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers, 1964.
Murdock, G.P. Social Structure. New York: Macmillan, 1969.
Schechner, R. Incest and culture: A reflexion on Claude Levi-Strauss.The Psychoanalytic Review, 1971,58, 563–572.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Serrano, A.C., Gunzburger, D.W. An historical perspective of incest. International Journal of Family Therapy 5, 70–80 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924434
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924434