Abstract
This article is the thirty-third of a series of articles discussing various open research problems in automated reasoning. The problem for research asks one to establish criteria for allowing certain — but not all — new clauses to become nuclei when using the inference rule hyperparamodulation or hyperresolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wos, L.:Automated Reasoning: 33 Basic Research Problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988.
Wos, L. and McCune, W.: Negative hyperparamodulation, in T. Siekmann (ed.),Proc. of the Eighth International Conference on Automated Deduction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 230, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986, pp. 229–239.
Wos, L., Overbeek, R., Lusk, E., and Boyle, J.:Automated Reasoning: Introduction and Applications, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the Office of Scientific Computing, U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wos, L. The problem of hyperparamodulation and nuclei. J Autom Reasoning 12, 407–409 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00885768
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00885768