Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adverbs and events

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Ajdukiewicz, K., ‘Syntactic Connection’, inPolish Logic (ed. by S. McCall), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 207–231. (English translation of ‘Die syntaktische Konnexität’,Studia Philosophica 1 (1935), 1–27.)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Åqvist, L. E. G., ‘Modal Logic With Subjunctive Conditionals and Dispositional Predicates’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (1973), 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bar Hillel, Y.,Language and Information, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brody, B. A., ‘De re andde dicto Interpretations of Modal Logic or a Return to an Aristotelean Essentialism’,Philosophia 2 (1972), 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carnap, R.,Introduction to Semantics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chomsky, A. N., ‘Deep Structure, Surface Structure and Semantic Interpretation’, inSemantics, An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology (ed. by D. D. Steinberg and L. A. Jakobovits), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1971, pp. 183–216.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Church, A., ‘A Formulation of the Simple Theory of Types’,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (1940), 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, R. L., ‘Concerning the Logic of Predicate Modifiers’,Noûs 4 (1970), 311–335.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cresswell, M. J., ‘Functions of Propositions’,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1966), 545–560.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cresswell, M. J., ‘Classical Intensional Logics’,Theoria 36 (1970), 347–372.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cresswell, M. J., ‘Intensional Logics and Logical Truth’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1972), 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cresswell, M. J.,Logics and Languages, Methuen, London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cresswell, M. J., ‘Physical Theories and Possible Worlds’,Logique et Analyse (forthcoming).

  14. Davidson, D., ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, inThe Logic of Decision and Action (ed. by N. Rescher), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1967, pp. 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davidson, D., ‘Truth and Meaning’, inPhilosophical Logic (ed. by J. W. Davis et al.), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davidson, D., ‘The Individuation of Events’, inEssays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel (ed. by N. Rescher et al.), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 216–234.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davidson, D., ‘Events as Particulars’,Noûs 4 (1970), 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dretske, F. I., ‘Contrastive Statements’,The Philosophical Review 81 (1972), 411–437.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fillmore, C. J., ‘The Case for Case’, inUniversals in Linguistic Theory (ed. by E. Bach and R. T. Harms), Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1968, pp. 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fraassen, B. C. van,Formal Semantics and Logic, Macmillan, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gabbay, D. M., ‘A General Theory of the Conditional in Terms of a Ternary Operator’,Theoria 38 (1972), 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geach, P. T., ‘A Program for Syntax’, in 483–497.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harman, G. H., ‘Is Modal Logic Logic?’,Philosophia 2 (1972), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hatcher, W. S.,Foundations of Mathematics, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hintikka, K. J. J., ‘Semantics for Propositional Attitudes’, inPhilosophical Logic (ed. by J. W. Daviset al.), 1969, pp. 21–45.

  26. Hintikka, K. J. J., ‘Existential and Uniqueness Presuppositions’, inProblems in Philosophical Logic (ed. by K. Lambert), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1970, pp. 20–55.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hintikka, K. J. J., ‘The Semantics of Modal Notions and the Indeterminacy of Ontology’, in 398–414.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hintikka, K. J. J., ‘Sosa on Propositional Attitudesde dicto andde re’,The Journal of Philosophy 68 (1971), 489–497.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lakoff, G., ‘Linguistics and Natural Logic’, in 545–665.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lakoff, G., ‘On Generative Semantics’, inSemantics: an Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology (ed. by D. D. Steinberg and L. A. Jakobovits), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1971, pp. 232–296.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lakoff, G., ‘Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 458–508.

  32. Lemmon, E. J., ‘Comments on D. Davidson's ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, inThe Logic of Decision and Action (ed. by N. Rescher), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1967, pp. 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lewis, D. K., ‘Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’,The Journal of Philosophy 65 (1968), 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lewis, D. K., ‘General Semantics’, in 169–218.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lewis, D. K.,Counterfactuals, Blackwell, Oxford, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lyons, J., ‘Towards a ‘Notional’ Theory of the Parts of Speech’,Journal of Linguistics 2 (1966), 209–236.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lyons, J.,Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  38. McCawley, J. D., ‘A Program for Logic’, in 498–544.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mendelson, E.,Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Meyer, R. K., ‘Intuitionism, Entailment, Negation’, inTruth, Syntax and Modality (ed. by H. Leblanc), North Holland, Amsterdam, 1973, pp. 168–198.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Montague, R., ‘On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities’,The Monist 35 (1969), 159–195.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Montague, R., ‘English as a Formal Language’, inLinguaggi nella società e nella technica, Edizione di Comunità, Milan, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Montague, R., ‘Universal Grammar’,Theoria 36 (1970), 373–398.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Montague, R., ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, inApproaches to Natural Language (ed. by K. J. J. Hintikkaet al.), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973, pp. 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Parsons, T., ‘Some Problems Concerning the Logic of Grammatical Modifiers’, in 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Prior, A. N., ‘Is the Concept of Referential Opacity Really Necessary?’,Acta Philosophica Fennica (1963),Modal and Many-valued Logics, pp. 189–198.

  47. Prior, A. N., ‘Modal Logic and the Logic of Applicability’,Theoria 34 (1968), 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Quine, W. V.,Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Quine, W. V., ‘Natural Kinds’, inOntological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Quine, W. V., ‘Propositional Objects’,, pp. 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Reichenbach, H.,Elements of Symbolic Logic, Macmillan, New York, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Scott, D. S., ‘Advice on Modal Logic’, inPhilosophical Problems in Logic (ed. by K. Lambert), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1970, pp. 143–173.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Smart, J. J. C., ‘Quine on Space-Time’ (Preliminary mimeographed draft of an article for a volume edited by P. A. Schilpp,The Philosophy of W. V. Quine).

  54. Stalnaker, R. C., ‘Pragmatics’, in pp. 380–397.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Stalnaker, R. C., ‘A Theory of Conditionals’, inStudies in Logical Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, 1968, pp. 98–112.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Stalnaker, R. C. and R. H. Thomason, ‘A Semantic Analysis of Conditional Logic’,Theoria 36 (1970), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tarski, A., ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, inLogic, Semantics and Metamathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1956, pp. 152–278.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tichý, P., ‘An Approach to Intensional Analysis’,Noûs 5 (1971), 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Thomson, J. J., ‘The Time of a Killing’,The Journal of Philosophy 68 (1971), 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vendler, Z., ‘Facts and Events’, inLinguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1967, pp. 122–146.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wallace, J., ‘On the Frame of Reference’, in 219–252.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wallace, J., ‘Some Logical Roles of Adverbs’,The Journal of Philosophy 68 (1971), 690–714.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wallace, J., ‘Positive, Comparative, Superlative’,69 (1972), 773–782.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wheeler, S. C., ‘Attributives and Their Modifiers’,Noûs 6 (1972), 310–334.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

    M. J. Cresswell

Authors
  1. M. J. Cresswell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cresswell, M.J. Adverbs and events. Synthese 28, 455–481 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877582

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877582

Search

Navigation