Skip to main content
Log in

The ‘Interests’ of science and the problems of education

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arbib, M. A. and M. B. Hesse: 1986,The Construction of Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. Jr.: 1983, ‘“Cosmos”, Cosmologies, and the Public Schools’,This World 5, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B.: 1974,Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J.: 1985,Habermas and Modernity, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M.: 1984,Matter and Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P.: 1983,God and the New Physics, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. L.: 1970, ‘Are Physicists to Blame?’,Physics Today, December, p. 80.

  • Denett, D. C.: 1981,Brainstorms, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, Hal.: 1965,Berkeley: The New Student Revolt, Grove Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, M.: 1984, ‘The Conflict in Moral Education: An Informal Case Study’, in N. Glazer (ed.),The Public Interest on Education, pp. 209–27.

  • Eger, M.: 1987a, ‘Philosophy of Science in Teacher Education’, in J. D. Novak (ed.),Proceedings of the Second International Seminar: Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, pp. 163–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, M.: 1987b, ‘Literature and the New Epic of Science: Why Habermas Was Wrong and Wilson Is Right’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Literature and Science, Worcester, Massachusetts, October 8–11.

  • Eger, M.: 1988, ‘A Tale of Two Controversies: Dissonance in the Theory and Practice of Rationality’,Zygon 23, 291–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M. and R. Winkler: 1981,Laws of the Game (tr. by R. Kimber and R. Kimber), Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.: 1975,Against Method, Thetford Press, Thetford, Norfolk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. M. and R. West: 1970, ‘What Our Left Hand Has Been Doing’,Physics Today, March, pp. 24–40.

  • Gallant, R. A.: 1984, ‘To Hell with Evolution’, inScience and Creationism, pp. 282–305. See Montagu 1984.

  • Gutting, G. (ed.): 1980,Paradigms and Revolutions, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1970, in J. Shapiro (trans.),Toward a Rational Society, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1971, in J. Shapiro (trans.),Knowledge and Human Interests, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1973, in J. Viertel (trans.),Theory and Practice, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1984, in T. McCarthy (trans.),Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. B.: 1980,Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, N.:Quantum Reality, Doubleday (Anchor), New York.

  • Hodson, D.: 1988, ‘Toward a Philosophically More Valid Science Curriculum’,Science Education XXX, 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. R.: 1980,Gödel, Escher, Bach, Random House (Vintage), New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G.: 1967, ‘Harvard Project Physics’,Physics Today, March, pp. 31–34.

  • Holton, G. and D. H. D. Roller: 1958,Foundations of Modern Physical Science, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1977,The Essential Tension, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Follette, M. C. (ed.): 1983,Creationism, Science, and the Law, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layman, J. W.: 1983, ‘Overview of the Problem’,Physics Today, September, pp. 26–30.

  • McMullin, E.: 1986, ‘The Shaping of Scientific Rationality’, conference paper presented at the University of Notre Dame.

  • Marcuse, H.: 1966,One Dimensional Man, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus G.: 1987, ‘Why Is There No Hermeneutics of Natural Sciences? Some Preliminary Theses’,Science in Context 1, 5–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, E. H.: 1970, ‘A Course on the Physics of Urban and Environmental Problems’,American Journal of Physics 38, 1244–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M.: 1972,Concepts of Science Education, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson, F. W.: 1966,The Broken Image, Doubleday, Anchor Books, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J.: 1971,Chance and Necessity, A. Wainhouse (trans.), Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagu, A. (ed.): 1984,Science and Creationism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D.: 1982,The Creation Controversy, W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, H.: 1971, ‘Science For the Nonscience Major — Problem and Partial Prescription’,American Journal of Physics 39, 1498–1503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. and I. Stengers: 1984,Order Out of Chaos, Bantam Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1981,Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigden, J. S.: 1979, ‘What Is Our Rationale?’,American Journal of Physics 47, 667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigden, J. S.: 1981, ‘What Is Scientific Literacy?’,American Journal of Physics 49, 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigden, J. S.: 1988, ‘A Call For a Martial Plan to Create a New Ecology for Education’,American Journal of Physics 56, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, R. H.: 1976,Energy, An Introduction to Physics, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S.: 1976,The Conscious Brain, Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saperstein, A. M.: 1975,Physics: Energy in the Environment, Little Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, R.: 1985,Science and the Moral Priority, 2nd ed., Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K.: 1982,Liberty and Learning, St. Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hise, Y. A. and J. Nelson: 1988, ‘AAPT's Physics Teaching Resource Agent Program’,Physics Today, March, pp. 47–50.

  • Wagner, P. A.: 1983, ‘The Nature of Paradigm Shifts and the Goals of Science Education’,Science Education 67, 605–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S.: 1979,The First Three Minutes, Bantam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizenbaum, J.: 1976,Computer Power and Human Reason, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer, F. H.: 1987, ‘Are Our Universities Rotten to the Core?’Science 246, 1165–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N.: 1955,The Aims of Education, Mentor Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O.: 1978,On Human Nature, Bantam Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eger, M. The ‘Interests’ of science and the problems of education. Synthese 80, 81–106 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869949

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869949

Navigation