Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modality, analogy, and ideal experiments according to C. S. Peirce

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Drake, F. R., ‘On McKinsey's syntactical characterization of systems of modal logic’,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (1962), 400–406.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hughes, G. E., and Cresswell, M. J.,An Introduction to Modal Logic, London: Methuen and Co., Ltd. (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. McKinsey, J. C. C., ‘On the syntactical construction of systems of modal logic’,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 10 (1945), 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan, C. G., ‘Peirce-semantics for modal logics’,Proceedings of the C. S. Peirce Bicentennial International Congress, forthcoming.

  5. Peirce, C. S.,Collected Papers of Charles Saunders Peirce, vols. I–VIII ed. by Charles Hartsborne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur W. Burks, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1933–1958).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Victoria, Canada

    Charles G. Morgan

Authors
  1. Charles G. Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, C.G. Modality, analogy, and ideal experiments according to C. S. Peirce. Synthese 41, 65–83 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869650

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869650

Keywords

Search

Navigation