Skip to main content
Log in

Complementarity meets general relativity: A study in ontological commitments and theory unification

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The apparent underdetermination of the formalism of quantum field theory (QFT) as between a particle and a field interpretation is studied in this paper through a detour over the problem of unifying QFT with general relativity. All we have at present is a partial or approximate unification, QFT in non-Minkowskian spaces. The nature of this hybrid and the problem of its internal consistency are discussed. One of its most striking implications is that particles do not have an observer-independent existence. We trace the ways in which physicists reacted to this at first highly implausible ontological consequence. We conclude that quantum fields rather than particles are after all the basic entities in QFT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashtekar, A. and R. Geroch: 1974, ‘Quantum Theory of Gravitation’,Rep. Prog. Phys. 37, 1211–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashtekar, A. and A. Magnon: 1975, ‘Quantum Fields in Curved Space-Times’,Proc. Roy. Soc. A346, 375–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, J.: 1981, ‘Quantum Gravity and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions’,Zeitschrift fur Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 12, 322–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, J.: 1989, ‘Vorläufige Physik und andere pragmatische Elemente der modernen Physik’, in H. Stachowiak (ed.),Pragmatik: Handbuch pragmatischen Denkens, Meiner, Hamburg (Forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. and J. M. Leinaas: 1983, ‘Electrons as Accelerated Thermometers’,Nucl. Phys. B212, 131–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birrell, N. D. and P. C. W. Davies: 1982,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenberger, R. H.: 1985, ‘Quantum Field Theory Methods and Inflationary Universe Models’,Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. C. W.: 1976, ‘Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time’,Nature 263, 377–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. C. W.: 1984, ‘Particles Do Not Exist’, in S. M. Christensen (ed.),Quantum Theory of Gravity, A. Hilger, Bristol, pp. 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witt, B. S.: 1975, ‘Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time’,Phys. Rep. 19, 295–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • De witt, B. S.: 1979, ‘Quantum Gravity: The New Synthesis’, in S. W. Hawking et al., (eds.),General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 680–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, M. J.: 1981, ‘Inconsistency of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time’, in C. J. Isham et al. (eds.),Quantum Gravity 2, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J.: 1981, ‘Combining Statistical Thermodynamics and Relativity Theory: Methodological and Foundations Problems’, inPSA 1978, Vol. 2, pp. 157–85.

  • Eppley, K. and E. Hannah: 1977, ‘The Necessity of Quantizing the Gravitational Field’,Foundations of Physics 7, 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulling, S. A.: 1973, ‘Nonuniqueness of Canonical Field Quantization in Riemannian Space-Time’,Phys. Rev. D7, 2850–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulling, S. A.: 1983, ‘Two-Point Functions and Renormalized Observables’, in K. Kikkawa et al. (eds.),Gauge Theory and Gravitation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 101–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulling, S. A.: 1984, ‘What Have We Learned from Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time?’, in S. M. Christensen (ed.),Quantum Theory of Gravity, A. Hilger, Briston, pp. 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, G. W. and S. W. Hawking: 1977, ‘Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation’,Phys. Rev. D15, 2738–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. W.: 1975, ‘Particle Creation by Black Holes’,Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isham, C. J.: 1977, ‘Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time’,8th Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, New York, [Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 302], pp. 114–57.

  • Joseph, G.: 1980, ‘The Many Sciences and the One World’,Journal of Philosophy 77, 773–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, T. W. B.: 1981, ‘Is a Semi-Classical Theory of Gravity Viable?’, in Isham et al. (eds.),Quantum Gravity 2, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koertge, N.: 1971, ‘Inter-Theoretic Criticism and the Growth of Science’, inPSA 1970, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 160–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, M. G.: 1983, ‘Quantum Field Theory for Philosophers’, inPSA 1982, Vol. 2, pp. 57–99.

  • Redhead, M. G.: 1988, ‘A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Field Theory’, in H. Brown et al. (eds.),Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich, F. and L. Hardin: 1983, ‘Established Theories’,Philosophy of Science 50, 603–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüger, A.: 1988, ‘Atomism from Cosmology. Schrödinger's Work on Wave Mechanics and Space-time Structure’,Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 18, 377–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciama, D. W., P. Candelas and D. Deutsch: 1981, ‘Quantum Field Theory, Horizons and Thermodynamics’,Advances in Physics 30, 327–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöckler, M.: 1984, ‘9 Thesen zum Dualismus von Welle und Teilchen’, in B. Kanitscheider (ed.),Moderne Naturphilosophie, Würzburg, pp. 223–42.

  • Teller, P.: 1983a, ‘Quantum Physics, the Identity of Indiscernibles and Some Unanswered Questions’,Philosophy of Science 50, 309–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 1983b, ‘Comments on the Papers of Cushing and Redhead’, inPSA 1982, Vol. 2, pp. 100–11.

  • Unruh, W. G.: 1976, ‘Notes on Black Hole Evaporation’,Phys. Rev. D14, 870–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, R. M. and W. G. Unruh: 1984, ‘What Happens When an Accelerating Observer Detects a Rindler Particle’,Phys. Rev. D29, 1047–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, R. M.: 1984,General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, R. M.: 1986, ‘Correlations and Causality in Quantum Field Theory’, in R. Penrose et al. (eds.),Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S.: 1977, ‘The Search for Unity: Notes for a History of Quantum Field Theory’,Daedalus 106, 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I should like to thank Professors Jürgen Audretsch, Paul Teller and Dr. Martin Carrier for helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rüger, A. Complementarity meets general relativity: A study in ontological commitments and theory unification. Synthese 79, 559–580 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869287

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869287

Keywords

Navigation