Abstract
In a set-up, where both the interest parameter and the nuisance parameter are possibly multi-dimensional and global parametric orthogonality may not hold, we suggest a test that is superior to the usual likelihood ratio test with regard to second-order local maximinity. The test can be motivated from the principles of conditional and adjusted likelihood.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amari, S. (1985).Differential Geometrical Methods in Statistics, Springer, New York.
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. (1986). Inference on full or partial parameters based on the standardized log-likelihood ratio,Biometrika,73, 307–322.
Chandra, T. K. and Ghosh, J. K. (1979). Valid asymptotic expansions for the likelihood ratio statistic and other perturbed chi-square variables,Sankhyā Ser. A,41, 22–47.
Chandra, T. K. and Ghosh, J. K. (1980). Valid asymptotic expansions for the likelihood ratio and other statistics under contiguous alternatives,Sankhyā Ser. A,42, 170–184.
Conniffe, D. (1990). Testing hypotheses with estimated scores,Biometrika,77, 97–106.
Cordeiro, G. M. and McCullagh, P. (1991). Bias correction in generalized linear models,J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,53, 629–643.
Cox, D. R. (1988). Some aspects of conditional and asymptotic inference: A review,Sankhyā Ser. A,50, 314–337.
Cox, D. R. and Reid, N. (1987). Parameter orthogonality and approximate conditional inference (with discussion),J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,49, 1–39.
Cox, D. R. and Snell, E. J. (1968). A general definition of residuals (with discussion),J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,30, 248–275.
Ghosh, J. K. and Mukerjee, R. (1992). Bayesian and frequentist Bartlett corrections for likelihood ratio and conditional likelihood ratio tests,J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,54, 867–875.
Godambe, V. P. (1991). Orthogonality of estimating functions and nuisance parameters,Biometrika,78, 143–151.
Harris, P. and Peers, H. W. (1980). The local power of the efficient scores test statistic,Biometrika,67, 525–529.
Hayakawa, T. (1975). The likelihood ratio criterion for a composite hypothesis under a local alternative,Biometrika,62, 451–460.
Hayakawa, T. (1977). The likelihood ratio criterion and the asymptotic expansion of its distribution,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,29, 359–378.
Liang, K. Y. (1987). Estimating functions and approximate conditional likelihood,Biometrika,74, 695–702.
McCullagh, P. (1987).Tensor Methods in Statistics, Chapman and Hall, London.
McCullagh, P. and Tibshirani, R. (1990). A simple method for the adjustment of profile likelihoods,J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,52, 325–344.
Mukerjee, R. (1992a). Comparison between the conditional likelihood ratio and the usual likelihood ratio tests,J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,54, 189–194.
Mukerjee, R. (1992b). Conditional likelihood and power: Higher order asymptotics,Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A,438, 433–446.
Mukerjee, R. and Chandra, T. K. (1991). Bartlett-type adjustment for the conditional likelihood ratio statistic of Cox and Reid,Biometrika,78, 365–372.
Peers, H. W. (1971). Likelihood ratio and associated test criteria,Biometrika,58, 477–487.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Mukerjee, R. An extension of the conditional likelihood ratio test to the general multiparameter case. Ann Inst Stat Math 45, 759–771 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00774786
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00774786