Skip to main content
Log in

Robust priors for smoothing and image restoration

  • Bayesian Approach
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Bayesian method for restoring an image corrupted by added Gaussian noise uses a Gibbs prior for the unknown clean image. The potential of this Gibbs prior penalizes differences between adjacent grey levels. In this paper we discuss the choice of the form and the parameters of the penalizing potential in a particular example used previously by Ogata (1990,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,42, 403–433). In this example the clean image is piecewise constant, but the constant patches and the step sizes at edges are small compared with the noise variance. We find that contrary to results reported in Ogata (1990,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,42, 403–433) the Bayesian method performs well provided the potential increases more slowly than a quadratic one and the scale parameter of the potential is sufficiently small. Convex potentials with bounded derivatives perform not much worse than bounded potentials, but are computationally much simpler. For bounded potentials we use a variant of simulated annealing. For quadratic potentials data-driven choices of the smoothing parameter are reviewed and compared. For other potentials the smoothing parameter is determined by considering which deviations from a flat image we would like to smooth out and retain respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1980). Likelihood and Bayes procedure,Bayesian Statistics (eds. J. M. Bernardo, M. H. De Groot, D. V. Lindley and A. F. M. Smith), University Press, Valencia, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R. (1960).Introduction to Matrix Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J. (1986). On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures (with discussion),J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,48, 192–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J. (1989). Towards Bayesian image analysis,J. Appl. Statist.,16, 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J., York, J. and Mollié, A. (1991). Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics (with discussion),Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,43, 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, D. and Reynolds, G. (1992). Constrained restoration and the recovery of discontinuities,IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,14, 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S. and Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images,IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,6, 721–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S. and McClure, D. E. (1987). Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction,Bulletin Internat. Statist. Inst. (Proc. 46 Session),52, Book 4, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. J. (1990). Penalized likelihood reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm,IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,9, 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Titterington, D. M. (1986). On some smoothing techniques used in image restoration,J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,48, 330–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. W. (1988). On the choice of regularisation parameter in image restoration,Pattern Recognition (ed. J. Kittler), Lecture Notes in Computer Science,301, 587–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, G. (1987). Non-Gaussian state space modeling of nonstationary time series (with discussion),J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.,82, 1032–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc, Y. G. (1989). Constructing simple stable descriptions for image partitioning,International Journal of Computer Vision,3, 73–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, Y. (1990). A Monte Carlo method for an objective Bayesian procedure,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,42, 403–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, P. J. and Leroy, A. M. (1987).Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed, T. P. (1978). Relations between models for spatial data, contingency tables and Markov fields on graphs,Supplement Advances in Applied Probability,10, 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, G. (1985). A comparison of GCV and GML for choosing the smoothing parameter in the generalized spline smoothing problem,Ann. Statist.,13, 1378–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, G. (1990).Spline Models for Observational Data, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series,59, SIAM, Philadelphia.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Künsch, H.R. Robust priors for smoothing and image restoration. Ann Inst Stat Math 46, 1–19 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00773588

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00773588

Key words and phrases

Navigation