Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive choice of trimming proportions

  • Estimation
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider Jaeckel's (1971,Ann. Math. Statist.,42, 1540–1552) proposal for choosing the trimming proportion of the trimmed mean in the more general context of choosing a trimming proportion for a trimmedL-estimator of location. We obtain higher order expansions which enable us to evaluate the effect of the estimated trimming proportion on the adaptive estimator. We find thatL-estimators with smooth weight functions are to be preferred to those with discontinuous weight functions (such as the trimmed mean) because the effect of the estimated trimming proportion on the estimator is of ordern −1 rather thann −3/4. In particular, we find that valid inferences can be based on a particular “smooth” trimmed mean with its asymptotic standard error and the Studentt distribution with degrees of freedom given by the Tukey and McLaughlin (1963,Sankhyā Ser. A,25, 331–352) proposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, D. F., Bickel, P. J., Hampel, F. R., Huber, P. J., Rogers, W. H. and Tukey, J. W. (1972)Robust Estimates of Location: Survey and Advances, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, P. (1965). On some robust estimates of location,Ann. Math. Statist.,36, 847–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, P. and Lehmann, E. L. (1975). Descriptive statistics for nonparametric models. II,Ann. Statist.,3, 1045–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. and Olshen, R. A. (1978). How broad is the class of normal scale mixtures?,Ann. Statist.,6, 1159–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A. M. (1973). A Monte Carlo swindle for estimators of location,Applied Statistics,22, 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A. M. (1977). Confidence intervals for bisquare regression estimates,J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.,72, 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1981). Large sample properties of Jaeckel's adaptive trimmed mean,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,33, 449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, F. R., Ronchetti, E. M., Rousseeuw, P. J. and Stahel, W. A. (1986).Robust Statistics: The Approach Based in Influence Functions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. A. and Dixon, W. J. (1982). Robustness in real life: a study of clinical laboratory data,Biometricsi,38, 377–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P. J. (1972). Robust statistics: a review,Ann. Math. Statist.,43, 1041–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeckel, L. A. (1971). Some flexible estimates of location,Ann. Math. Statist.,42, 1540–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurečková, J. (1986). Asymptotic representations ofL-estimators and their relations toM-estimators,Sequential Anal.,5, 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relles, D. A. (1970). Variance reduction techniques for Monte Carlo sampling from Student distributions,Technometrics,12, 499–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocke, D. M., Downs, G. W. and Rocke, A. J. (1982). Are robust estimators really necessary?,Technometrics,24, 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, M. M. (1960). Distribution of quantiles in samples from a bivariate population,J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards,64B, 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spjotvoll, E. and Aastreit, A. H. (1980). Comparison of robust estimators on data from field experiments,Scand. J. Statist.,7, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, S. M. (1973). The asymptotic distribution of the trimmed mean,Ann. Statist.,1, 472–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, S. M. (1977). Do robust estimators work with real data?,Ann. Statist.,5, 1055–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. and McLaughlin, D. H. (1963). Less vulnerable confidence and significance procedures for location based on a single sample (Trimming/Winsorisation 1),Sankhyā Ser. A,25, 331–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, A. H. (1988). Asymptotically efficient estimation of the sparsity function at a point,Statist. Probab. Lett.,6, 427–432.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Jurečková, J., Koenker, R. & Welsh, A.H. Adaptive choice of trimming proportions. Ann Inst Stat Math 46, 737–755 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00773479

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00773479

Key words and phrases

Navigation