References
Belletti, A. and L. Rizzi: 1988, ‘Psych Verbs and Theta-theory’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352.
Bouchard, D.: 1984,On the Content of Empty Categories, Foris, Dordrecht.
Burzio, L.: 1989, ‘Work in Progress’, ms. Harvard University, Cambridge.
Cantrall, W.: 1974,Viewpoint, Reflexives, and the Nature of Noun Phrases, Mouton, The Hague.
Carlson, G.: 1987, ‘Same and Different’,Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 531–565.
Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, N.: 1986,Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger, New York.
Farmer, A.: 1987, ‘They Held Each Other's Breath and Other Puzzles for the Binding Theory’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 157–163.
Finer, D.: 1984, The Formal Grammar of Switch-Reference, University Mass Ph.D. dissertation, distributed by GLSA, University Mass., Amherst.
Green, G.: 1973, ‘Some Remarks on Split Controller Phenomena’, in C. Corum, T. Smith-Stark, and A. Weiser (eds.),Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
Gruber,: 1976,Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, Linguistic Series Number 25, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Heim, I., H. Lasnik and R. May: 1991, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’,Linguistic Inquiry 21, 63–102.
Hellan, L.: 1988,Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.
Higginbotham, J.: 1983, ‘Logical Form, Binding and Nominals’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 395–420.
Huang, J.: 1983, ‘A Note on the Binding Theory’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 554–561.
Jackendoff, R.: 1972,Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Jacobson, P. and P. Neubauer: 1976, ‘Rule Cyclicity: Evidence from the Intervention Constraint’,Linguistic Inquiry 7, 429–462.
Kayne, R.: 1975,French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Keenan, E.: 1988, ‘Complex Anphors and Bind Alpha’, inCLS 24, Chicago Linguistics Club, Chicago.
Koster, J.: 1978,Locality Principles in Syntax, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.
Kuno, S.: 1987,Functional Syntax, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Larson, R.: 1988, ‘Scope and Comparatives’,Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 1–26.
Lasnik, H.: 1980, ‘On Two Recent Treatments of Disjoint Reference’,Linguistic Research l, 48–58.
Lasnik, H. and T. Stowell: 1987, ‘Weakest Crossover’, to appear inLinguistic Inquiry.
Lebeaux, D.: 1983, ‘A Distributional Difference Between Reciprocals and Reflexives’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 723–730.
Lebeaux, D.: 1984/5, ‘Locality and Anaphoric Binding’,The Linguistic Review 4, 343–363.
Mating, J.: 1984, ‘Non-clause Bounded Reflexives in Icelandic’,Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 211–241.
Napoli, D.-J.: 1989,Predication Theory; A Case Study for Indexing Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
Pica, P.: 1984, ‘Liage et Contiguité, in J.-C. Milner (ed.),Actes de la table ronde sur l'anaphore, Cahiers de l'E.R.A. 642, Paris.
Pica, P.: 1987, ‘On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle’, inProceedings of NELS 17, J. McDonough and B. Plunkett, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Postal, P.: 1974,On Raising, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Reinhart, T.: 1983, ‘Coreference and Bound Anaphora; A Restatement of the Anaphora Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 47–88.
Reinhart, T. and E. Reuland: 1989, ‘Anaphoric Territories’, ms., Tel Aviv University and University of Groningen.
Rooth, M.: 1985,Association with Focus, University of Massachusetts Ph.D. dissertation, GLSA, Amherst.
Ross, J.: 1970, ‘On Declarative Sentences’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.),Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham.
Safir, K.: 1987a, ‘What Explains the Definiteness Effect’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.),The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Safir, K.: 1987b, ‘The Syntactic Projection of Lexical Thematic Structure’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(4).
Safir, K. and T. Stowell: 1988, ‘Binominal Each’, inNELS 18, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Sag, L: 1976,Deletion and Logical Form, unpublished MIT Ph.D dissertation.
Sells, P.: 1987, ‘Aspects of Logophoricity’,Linguistic Inquiry 18; 369–412.
Sells, P., A. Zaenen and D. Zec: 1987, ‘Relations between Syntax, Semantics and Lexical Structure’, in M. Iida, S. Wechsler and D. Zec (eds.),Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure, CSLI, Stanford.
Seely, D.: 1987, ‘Stressed and Non-stressed Anaphors, the Binding Theory and Chains’, unpublished ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Zribi-Hertz, A.: 1981, ‘Coréférence et pronoms réfléchis: notes sur le contraste luillui-même en français’,Linguisticae Investigationes 4, 131–179.
Zribi-Hertz, A.: 1989, ‘Anaphor Binding and Narrative Point of View: English Reflexive Pronouns in Sentence and Discourse’,Language 65, 695–727.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank audiences at the CUNY Graduate Center, NELS XIX at Cornell, USC and the University of Maryland for helpful commentary. In particular I would like to thank Maria Bittner, Luigi Burzio, Greg Carlson, Martin Everaert, Robert Fiengo, Dan Finer, Allesandra Giorgi, Arild Hestvik, Jim Higginbotham, David Lebeaux, Donna Jo Napoli and Sten Vikner for useful discussions. I would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for useful criticism and Pauline Jacobson for her editorial judgement, most of it right, however much I resisted it. Research for this work was supported by an NEH Summer Stipend (1988), a Trustees Research Grant from Rutgers University, and a Research Council Grant (1989–90), also from Rutgers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Safir, K. Implied non-coreference and the pattern of anaphora. Linguist Philos 15, 1–52 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635831
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635831