Skip to main content
Log in

Vesicostomy in childhood: indications and results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors report their experience with 27 patients who underwent cutaneous vesicostomy (CV) diversion for either lower tract disorders or obstruction. The indications for CV included 18 cases of neurogenic bladder, 3 pseudo-prune belly syndrome, 3 bladder exstrophy, 2 vesicoureteral reflux, and 1 posterior urethral valves. A Lapides-type technique with minor changes was performed in all cases. Improvement of renal function occurred after CV in all but 3 patients (11.1%). No early surgical complications were observed. Late complications occurred in 8 patients (29.6%): 4 (14.8%) had a stomal stenosis and 4 (14.8%) urinary tract infections. The overall revision rate was 7.4%. We believe this technique is simple to perform, tubeless, easy to manage, and readly reversible. Our experience tends to confirm CV to be an easy, effective, and reversible means to treat children and infants with selected pathology of the lower urinary tract. Results and complications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adzick NS, Harrisson MR, Glick PL, Delorimier AA (1986) Temporary cutaneous umbilical vesicostomy in premature infants with urethral obstruction. J Pediatr Surg 21: 1712–1715

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen TD (1980) Vesicostomy for the temporary diversion of the urine in small children. J Urol 123: 929–931

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer AB, Colodny AH, Retik AB (1982) The management of vesicoureteral reflux in children with myelodysplasia. J Urol 128: 102–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blocksom BH Jr (1957) Bladder pouch for prolonged tubuless cystostomy. J Urol 78: 398–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruce RR, Gonzales ET Jr (1980) Cutaneous vesicostomy: a useful form for temporary diversion in children. J Urol 123: 927–928

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen JS, Harbach LB, Kaplan GW (1978) Cutaneous vesicostomy for temporary diversion in children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. J Urol 119: 120–124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hurwitz RS, Ehrlich RM (1983) Complications of cutaneous vesicostomy in children. In: Ehrlich RM (ed) The Urologic Clinics of North America vol. 10 N° 3. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 503–508

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krahn CG, Johnson HW (1993) Cutaneous vesicostomy in the young child: indications and results. Urology 41: 558–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ireland GW, Geist RW (1970) Difficulties with vesicostomies in 19 children with myelomeningocele. J Urol 103: 341–345

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lapides J, Ajemian EP, Lichtwardt JR (1960) Cutaneous vesicostomy. J Urol 84: 609–613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Noe HN, Jerkins GR (1985) Cutaneous vesicostomy: experience in infants and children. J Urol 134: 301–303

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Snyder HM, Kalichman MA, Charney E, Duckett JW (1983) Vesicostomy for neurogenic bladder with spina bifida: follow-up. J Urol 130: 724–728

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Benedetto, V., Bankole Sanni, R., Miano, L. et al. Vesicostomy in childhood: indications and results. Pediatr Surg Int 11, 348–350 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00497809

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00497809

Key words

Navigation